Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep 10;584(17):3703-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.057. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

Collaboration and competition between DNA double-strand break repair pathways

Affiliations
Review

Collaboration and competition between DNA double-strand break repair pathways

Elizabeth M Kass et al. FEBS Lett. .

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks resulting from normal cellular processes including replication and exogenous sources such as ionizing radiation pose a serious risk to genome stability, and cells have evolved different mechanisms for their efficient repair. The two major pathways involved in the repair of double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells are non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination. Numerous factors affect the decision to repair a double-strand break via these pathways, and accumulating evidence suggests these major repair pathways both cooperate and compete with each other at double-strand break sites to facilitate efficient repair and promote genomic integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Competition between double-strand break repair pathways. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by two distinct pathways, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR is initiated by 5′ to 3′ end resection, forming a 3′ single-stranded tail onto which Rad51 assembles. The Rad51 nucleoprotein filament allows single-strand DNA invasion into a homologous duplex, typically the sister chromatid, to initiate repair synthesis. The newly synthesized strand is then displaced to anneal to the other DNA end (not shown) to complete the HR reaction. When a DSB and subsequent end resection occurs at sequence repeats (green lines), an alternative pathway, single-strand annealing (SSA), can take place. The complementary single strands at the repeats can anneal, giving rise to a copy number variant, in this case a product with a single copy of the repeat and a deletion of the intervening sequence. NHEJ involves the joining of DNA ends with no or little homology (microhomology). In this pathway, the Ku heterodimer binds to DNA ends, protecting them from end resection. A number of processing factors are subsequently recruited (not shown), which allows a variety of end structures to be joined. Mutational analysis has demonstrated that factors involved in HR and NHEJ likely directly “compete” at steps indicated by the numbers: (1) loss of canonical NHEJ factors (Ku, DNA ligase IV/XRCC4) leads to increased end resection and hence HR and SSA. (2) End resection mutants (e.g., Sae2) have increased NHEJ. (3) Disruption of Rad51 filament formation allows DNA ends to be channeled into SSA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071–1078. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieber MR. The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:1–5. - PubMed
    1. Moynahan ME, Jasin M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:196–207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Nucleases and helicases take center stage in homologous recombination. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:264–272. - PubMed
    1. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature. 2008;455:770–774. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types