Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr 20;5(4):e10247.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010247.

Evaluation of the psoriasis transcriptome across different studies by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)

Mayte Suárez-Fariñas  1 , Michelle A Lowes, Lisa C Zaba, James G Krueger
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the psoriasis transcriptome across different studies by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)

Mayte Suárez-Fariñas et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to develop a consistent molecular definition of psoriasis. There have been several published microarray studies of psoriasis, and we compared disease-related genes identified across these different studies of psoriasis with our own in order to establish a consensus.

Methodology/principal findings: We present a psoriasis transcriptome from a group of 15 patients enrolled in a clinical study, and assessed its biological validity using a set of important pathways known to be involved in psoriasis. We also identified a key set of cytokines that are now strongly implicated in driving disease-related pathology, but which are not detected well on gene array platforms and require more sensitive methods to measure mRNA levels in skin tissues. Comparison of our transcriptome with three other published lists of psoriasis genes showed apparent inconsistencies based on the number of overlapping genes. We extended the well-established approach of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to compare a new study with these other published list of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in a more comprehensive manner. We applied our method to these three published psoriasis transcriptomes and found them to be in good agreement with our study.

Conclusions/significance: Due to wide variability in clinical protocols, platform and sample handling, and subtle disease-related signals, intersection of published DEG lists was unable to establish consensus between studies. In order to leverage the power of multiple transcriptomes reported by several laboratories using different patients and protocols, more sophisticated methods like the extension of GSEA presented here, should be used in order to overcome the shortcomings of overlapping individual DEG approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of four psoriasis transcriptomes.
A. Venn diagram showing the comparison of the number of up-regulated genes in common and distinct for the four studies. B. Venn diagram showing the comparison of the number of down-regulated genes in common and distinct for the four studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rank of the published DEG lists in our fold change data.
A. Rank of Zhou's genes in our data set ordered by fold change expression, with Enrichment plots for the up-regulated and downregulated genes data below. B. As A but for Yao's study. C. As A but for Gudjonsson's study. A detailed explanation of Enrichment plots can be found in Figure 1 of original Subramanian et al .
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Irizarry RA, Warren D, Spencer F, Kim IF, Biswal S, et al. Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms. Nat Methods. 2005;2:345–350. - PubMed
    1. Larkin JE, Frank BC, Gavras H, Sultana R, Quackenbush J. Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms. Nat Methods. 2005;2:337–343. - PubMed
    1. Shi LM, Perkins RG, Fang H, Tong WD. Reproducible and reliable microarray results through quality control: good laboratory proficiency and appropriate data analysis practices are essential. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2008;19:10–18. - PubMed
    1. Suarez-Farinas M, Magnasco MO. Comparing microarray studies. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;377:139–152. - PubMed
    1. Suarez-Farinas M, Noggle S, Heke M, Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Magnasco MO. Comparing independent microarray studies: the case of human embryonic stem cells. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:99. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms