Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 14;303(14):1375-82.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.423.

Dried blood spot real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection

Collaborators, Affiliations

Dried blood spot real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection

Suresh B Boppana et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Context: Reliable methods to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection are needed for identification of infants at increased risk of hearing loss. Since dried blood spots (DBS) are routinely collected for metabolic screening from all newborns in the United States, there has been interest in using DBS polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for newborn CMV screening.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DBS real-time PCR assays for newborn CMV screening.

Design, setting, and participants: Between March 2007 and May 2008, infants born at 7 US medical centers had saliva specimens tested by rapid culture for early antigen fluorescent foci. Results of saliva rapid culture were compared with a single-primer (March 2007-December 2007) and a 2-primer DBS real-time PCR (January 2008-May 2008). Infants whose specimens screened positive on rapid culture or PCR had congenital infection confirmed by the reference standard method with rapid culture testing on saliva or urine.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) of single-primer and 2-primer DBS real-time PCR assays for identifying infants with confirmed congenital CMV infection.

Results: Congenital CMV infection was confirmed in 92 of 20,448 (0.45%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36%-0.55%) infants. Ninety-one of 92 infants had positive results on saliva rapid culture. Of the 11,422 infants screened using the single-primer DBS PCR, 17 of 60 (28%) infants had positive results with this assay, whereas, among the 9026 infants screened using the 2-primer DBS PCR, 11 of 32 (34%) screened positive. The single-primer DBS PCR identified congenital CMV infection with a sensitivity of 28.3% (95% CI, 17.4%-41.4%), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100%), positive LR of 803.7 (95% CI, 278.7-2317.9), and negative LR of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.6-0.8). The positive and negative predictive values of the single-primer DBS PCR were 80.9% (95% CI, 58.1%-94.5%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 99.5%-99.7%), respectively. The 2-primer DBS PCR assay identified infants with congenital CMV infection with a sensitivity of 34.4% (95% CI, 18.6%-53.2%), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9%-100.0%), positive LR of 3088.9 (95% CI, 410.8-23 226.7), and negative LR of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-0.8). The positive and negative predictive values of the 2-primer DBS PCR were 91.7% (95% CI, 61.5%-99.8%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.6%-99.9%), respectively.

Conclusion: Among newborns, CMV testing with DBS real-time PCR compared with saliva rapid culture had low sensitivity, limiting its value as a screening test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosures: None of the authors had potential conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations (other than those listed in the title page of the manuscript) relevant to the subject of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram demonstrating the evaluation of DBS real-time PCR assays for identifying infants with congenital CMV infection. DEAFF, indicates detection of early antigen fluorescent foci; DBS, dried blood spots; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CMV, cytomegalovirus.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dahle AFKB, Wright JD, Boppana SB, Britt WJ, Pass RF. Longitudinal investigation of hearing disorders in children with congenital cytomegalovirus. J. Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:283–290. - PubMed
    1. Demmler GJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control. Summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:315–329. - PubMed
    1. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening -- a silent revolution. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2151–2164. - PubMed
    1. Ross SA, Fowler KB, Guha A, et al. Hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection born to mothers with preexisting immunity. J Pediatr. 2006;148:332–336. - PubMed
    1. Stehel EK, Shoup AG, Owen KE, et al. Newborn hearing screening and detection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 2008;121:970–975. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms