Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3651-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912087107. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin

Chunhui Hou  1 , Ryan Dale, Ann Dean
Affiliations

Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin

Chunhui Hou et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

CTCF sites are abundant in the genomes of diverse species but their function is enigmatic. We used chromosome conformation capture to determine long-range interactions among CTCF/cohesin sites over 2 Mb on human chromosome 11 encompassing the beta-globin locus and flanking olfactory receptor genes. Although CTCF occupies these sites in both erythroid K562 cells and fibroblast 293T cells, the long-range interaction frequencies among the sites are highly cell type specific, revealing a more densely clustered organization in the absence of globin gene activity. Both CTCF and cohesins are required for the cell-type-specific chromatin conformation. Furthermore, loss of the organizational loops in K562 cells through reduction of CTCF with shRNA results in acquisition of repressive histone marks in the globin locus and reduces globin gene expression whereas silent flanking olfactory receptor genes are unaffected. These results support a genome-wide role for CTCF/cohesin sites through loop formation that both influences transcription and contributes to cell-type-specific chromatin organization and function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CTCF occupancy and chromatin loop formation over 2 Mb of chromosome 11. (A) CTCF localization on chr11:4,000,000–6,000,000 in K562 and 293T cells derived from ChIP-chip experiments. CTCF peaks were predicted using the ACME algorithm optimized to the training set (C1–C31) of sites validated by ChIP. RefSeq genes are depicted at the bottom in red (globin genes), blue (odorant receptor genes), or gray (other genes). (B) Long-range interactions among CTCF/cohesin sites vary between cell types. (Upper) 3C was carried out with K562 cell chromatin. Specific interactions between and among CTCF sites (black circles; gray circles represent CTCF sites not analyzed by 3C) are depicted by blue lines with the height of the curve corresponding to the cross-linking frequency. (Lower) Interactions among CTCF sites in 293T cells are depicted by red curves.Cross-linking is plotted relative to the signal for two fragments in the α-tubulin gene. Note the log scale of the y axis. Error bars represent SD.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Reduction of CTCF results in loss of long-range interactions between and among its binding sites. (A) Western blot indicating reduction of CTCF protein by shRNA without alteration of Rad21 or SMC3 levels. (B) K562 cells were transduced with control or CTCF shRNA. ChIP was performed with an antibody to CTCF. Error bars represent SEM. (C) 3C was carried out using chromatin from K562 cells transduced with control or CTCF shRNA. Interactions between and among CTCF sites are indicated by blue curves, and reduction of these interactions after knock-down of CTCF is indicated by gray curves. Error bars represent SD. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Reduction of cohesin components diminishes long-range interactions among CTCF sites. (A) Western blots showing reduction of Rad21 by shRNA and lack of effect of this reduction on CTCF protein. (B) K562 cells were transduced with control or Rad21 shRNA. ChIP was performed with an antibody to Rad21. Error bars represent SEM. (C) ChIP was carried out as described in B with antibodies to CTCF. (D) 3C was carried out using chromatin from K562 cells transduced with control or Rad21 shRNA. Interactions between and among CTCF sites are indicated by blue curves, and reduction of interactions after knock-down of Rad21 is indicated by gray curves. Error bars represent SEM. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Effect of CTCF shRNA on K562 cells. (A) RT–PCR analysis of globin gene transcription in K562 cells after transduction with control or CTCF shRNA. Results of three RNA preparations are shown ±SEM. (B) ChIP performed on chromatin from K562 cells after treatment with control or CTCF shRNA using an antibody against RNA pol II. Error bars represent SEM. Amplicons include ERVin and ERVdn, within and downstream (unique amplicon) of ERV9-LTR; HS5 and 3′HS1, globin locus-flanking CTCF sites; HS1–HS4, locus control region DNase I hypersensitive sites; globin gene promoters and exons as indicated; and OR51V1, odorant receptor gene in the globin locus 3′ flank. (C) ChIP was performed using K562 cell chromatin as described in B with antibodies to H3K4me2, H3K9me2, CTCF, and SMC1. H3 methylation is plotted with the highest value for each modification set to 1 in the line graphs. CTCF or cohesin ChIP enrichment is represented by superimposed bars. Diagram at the top: orange lines, globin genes; gray box, LCR; blue lines, odorant receptor genes; gray lines, other silent genes; green lines, ERV9-LTR. Note the depiction of chromosome 11 in the 5′ to 3′ direction, which is reversed compared to the Genome browser view in Figs. 1–3. Panel C is drawn to scale but the numbers below the graph are arbitrary. (D) ChIP was performed as described in B with antibodies to H3K4me2. (E) ChIP was performed as described in B using an antibody to H3K9me2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Fraser P, Bickmore W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature. 2007;447:413–417. - PubMed
    1. Wallace JA, Felsenfeld G. We gather together: Insulators and genome organization. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17:400–407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Capelson M, Corces VG. Boundary elements and nuclear organization. Biol Cell. 2004;96:617–629. - PubMed
    1. Bushey AM, Ramos E, Corces VG. Three subclasses of a Drosophila insulator show distinct and cell type-specific genomic distributions. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1338–1350. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips JE, Corces VG. CTCF: Master weaver of the genome. Cell. 2009;137:1194–1211. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms