AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation
- PMID: 19952629
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf8087
AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation
Abstract
Background: The performance of AlloDerm (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, N.J.) in the setting of prosthetic breast reconstruction, infection, and radiation therapy has not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to review the author's experience with AlloDerm-assisted prosthetic breast surgery and determine the tolerance in the setting of infection and irradiation.
Methods: A total of 361 women and 476 breasts underwent reconstruction or revision with prosthetic devices. Of these, 76 women and 100 breasts underwent reconstruction using AlloDerm assistance.
Results: The incidence of postoperative infection was 5.85 percent (22 of 376) when prosthetic devices were used without AlloDerm and 5 percent (five of 100) when prosthetic devices were used with AlloDerm. Radiation therapy was a factor in 23 of 100 breasts reconstructed with AlloDerm. Adherence of AlloDerm was noted in 100 percent (23 of 23) and infection was noted in 8.7 percent (two of 23). The timing of irradiation (before or after AlloDerm insertion) did not affect the adherence or the infection rate. The overall incidence of seroma was 5 percent, the incidence of skin necrosis was 3 percent, and the incidence of incisional dehiscence was 4 percent.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that prosthetic breast surgery using AlloDerm is safe and well-tolerated. AlloDerm viability has been demonstrated in the setting of infection and radiation therapy. The risk of prosthetic breast infection in the setting with AlloDerm is no different from in the setting without AlloDerm. Local complications such as dehiscence, skin necrosis, and seroma formation can occur in accordance with radiotherapy.
Comment in
-
AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;126(3):1120. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e60652. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20811254 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Total Muscle Coverage versus AlloDerm Human Dermal Matrix for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005076. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 30589768
-
Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547a45. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22743866
-
Comparison of outcomes using AlloDerm versus FlexHD for implant-based breast reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg. 2014 May;72(5):503-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318268a87c. Ann Plast Surg. 2014. PMID: 23636114
-
Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1820-1827. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf821a. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19952638 Review. No abstract available.
-
A Meta-analysis of Studies Comparing Outcomes of Diverse Acellular Dermal Matrices for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jul;79(1):115-123. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001085. Ann Plast Surg. 2017. PMID: 28509698 Review.
Cited by
-
Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction.Eplasty. 2012;12:e58. Epub 2012 Dec 19. Eplasty. 2012. PMID: 23308305 Free PMC article.
-
Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eplasty. 2011;11:e40. Epub 2011 Nov 3. Eplasty. 2011. PMID: 22084645 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Cross-linked and Non-Cross-linked Acellular Porcine Dermal Scaffolds for Long-term Full-Thickness Hernia Repair in a Small Animal Model.Eplasty. 2014 Jun 17;14:e22. eCollection 2014. Eplasty. 2014. PMID: 24966996 Free PMC article.
-
SERI Surgical Scaffold in 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction: 2-Year Data from a Prospective, Multicenter Trial.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 May 16;5(5):e1327. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001327. eCollection 2017 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017. PMID: 28607855 Free PMC article.
-
Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix after Breast Cancer: Comparative Study and Evaluation of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;15(22):5349. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225349. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38001609 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN. Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:467–476.
-
- Disa JJ, Ad-El DD, Cohen SM, Cordeiro PG, Hidalgo DA. The premature removal of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1662–1665.
-
- Kraemer O, Anderson M, Siim E. Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1996;30:201–206.
-
- Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:713–721.
-
- Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:907–912.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical