Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;18(7):873-80.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9. Epub 2009 Jun 19.

Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items

Ron D Hays  1 , Jakob B Bjorner, Dennis A Revicki, Karen L Spritzer, David Cella
Affiliations

Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items

Ron D Hays et al. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The use of global health items permits an efficient way of gathering general perceptions of health. These items provide useful summary information about health and are predictive of health care utilization and subsequent mortality.

Methods: Analyses of 10 self-reported global health items obtained from an internet survey as part of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) project. We derived summary scores from the global health items. We estimated the associations of the summary scores with the EQ-5D index score and the PROMIS physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and social health domain scores.

Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor model. Global physical health (GPH; 4 items on overall physical health, physical function, pain, and fatigue) and global mental health (GMH; 4 items on quality of life, mental health, satisfaction with social activities, and emotional problems) scales were created. The scales had internal consistency reliability coefficients of 0.81 and 0.86, respectively. GPH correlated more strongly with the EQ-5D than did GMH (r = 0.76 vs. 0.59). GPH correlated most strongly with pain impact (r = -0.75) whereas GMH correlated most strongly with depressive symptoms (r = -0.71).

Conclusions: Two dimensions representing physical and mental health underlie the global health items in PROMIS. These global health scales can be used to efficiently summarize physical and mental health in patient-reported outcome studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PROMIS data collection (n = 21,133)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.309', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.309'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10352861', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10352861/'}]}
    2. McHorney, C. A. (1999). Health status assessment methods for adults: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Annual Review of Public Health,20, 309–335. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.06.078'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '14966096', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14966096/'}]}
    2. Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology,22, 714–724. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10747763', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10747763/'}]}
    2. Coons, S. J., Rao, S., Keininger, D. L., & Hays, R. D. (2000). A comparative review of generic quality of life instruments. PharmacoEconomics,17, 13–35. - PubMed
    1. None
    2. Nelson, E. C., Wasson, J. H., Johnson, D. J., & Hays, R. D. (1996). Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 161–168). New York: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
    1. None
    2. Bjorner, J. B., Fayers, P. M., & Idler, E. L. (2005). Self-rated health. In P. M. Fayers & R. D. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life (pp. 309–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.