Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;4(5):e5548.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005548. Epub 2009 May 14.

Genome-wide massively parallel sequencing of formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues for copy-number- and mutation-analysis

Affiliations

Genome-wide massively parallel sequencing of formaldehyde fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues for copy-number- and mutation-analysis

Michal R Schweiger et al. PLoS One. 2009.

Abstract

Background: Cancer re-sequencing programs rely on DNA isolated from fresh snap frozen tissues, the preparation of which is combined with additional preservation efforts. Tissue samples at pathology departments are routinely stored as formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples and their use would open up access to a variety of clinical trials. However, FFPE preparation is incompatible with many down-stream molecular biology techniques such as PCR based amplification methods and gene expression studies.

Methodology/principal findings: Here we investigated the sample quality requirements of FFPE tissues for massively parallel short-read sequencing approaches. We evaluated key variables of pre-fixation, fixation related and post-fixation processes that occur in routine medical service (e.g. degree of autolysis, duration of fixation and of storage). We also investigated the influence of tissue storage time on sequencing quality by using material that was up to 18 years old. Finally, we analyzed normal and tumor breast tissues using the Sequencing by Synthesis technique (Illumina Genome Analyzer, Solexa) to simultaneously localize genome-wide copy number alterations and to detect genomic variations such as substitutions and point-deletions and/or insertions in FFPE tissue samples.

Conclusions/significance: The application of second generation sequencing techniques on small amounts of FFPE material opens up the possibility to analyze tissue samples which have been collected during routine clinical work as well as in the context of clinical trials. This is in particular important since FFPE samples are amply available from surgical tumor resections and histopathological diagnosis, and comprise tissue from precursor lesions, primary tumors, lymphogenic and/or hematogenic metastases. Large-scale studies using this tissue material will result in a better prediction of the prognosis of cancer patients and the early identification of patients which will respond to therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of sequencing fragments for DNA extracted from snap frozen and FFPE breast tissues.
(A) Shown are the distributions of sequencing fragments over chromosome 1 using three different tissue conservation techniques Left: Snap frozen tissues, middle: FFPE tissue with 20 min. ischemia, and right: FFPE tissue with 60 min. ischemia. The red line depicts median genome coverage. (B) Chromosomal coverage ratio of snap frozen versus FFPE preparations of normal tissue samples. Each chromosome has been split into equal sized bins of 50 Kb size. The log2 ratios of unique reads per bin have been plotted across all chromosomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Copy number variations in DNA from snap frozen and FFPE cancer tissues in relation to normal tissue.
(A) DNA fragment coverage ratio of tumor versus normal tissue on five chromosomes. The x-axis represents the genomic position. The y-axis represents the log2 ratio of fragments per bin of tumor versus normal tissue. The fragment numbers are calculated per 120 Kb segment. The red lines depict the local averages as calculated by DNAcopy . Local differences in copy numbers exceeding two standard deviations are highlighted. (B) Detailed view of the fragment distribution of chromosome 8 from snap frozen and FFPE breast cancer tissue samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Nucleotide exchange rates in DNA from snap frozen and FFPE tissues.
Using the Maq 0.7.1 software nucleotide exchanges were calculated for all possible transitions (e.g. A>G, A>C) for four snap frozen (SF) and five FFPE tissue samples . Shown are boxblots with NE rates as fractions of all mutations found per patient sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1135–1145. - PubMed
    1. Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW. Gene expression analysis goes digital. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:878–880. - PubMed
    1. Sultan M, Schulz MH, Richard H, Magen A, Klingenhoff A, et al. A global view of gene activity and alternative splicing by deep sequencing of the human transcriptome. Science. 2008;321:956–960. - PubMed
    1. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437:376–380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell PJ, Stephens PJ, Pleasance ED, O'Meara S, Li H, et al. Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat Genet. 2008;40:722–729. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types