The effect of AlloDerm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation
- PMID: 19319043
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199eef3
The effect of AlloDerm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation
Abstract
Background: The pathobiology of radiation-induced periprosthetic capsular formation and factors that may ameliorate its development have not been fully elucidated. The authors hypothesized that AlloDerm would diminish radiation-induced capsular formation.
Methods: Two 5-ml implants were placed submuscularly in the backs of 41 rats. The right implant was wrapped with AlloDerm and the left remained bare. After 48 hours, 20 animals underwent irradiation to each implant, and 21 animals underwent no further treatment and served as controls. After 3 and 12 weeks, the capsules were harvested and submitted for tensile strength and histologic examination. Intraprosthetic pressures were measured in each implant at the time of surgery and when the animals were killed.
Results: The intraprosthetic pressure decrease was uniform among all groups at 3 and 12 weeks. Between 3 and 12 weeks, capsular tensile strength increased in nonirradiated bare implants. There was considerable invasion of nonirradiated AlloDerm by inflammatory infiltrates at 3 weeks, and AlloDerm thickness decreased over time. Cellular invasion of AlloDerm was decreased with irradiation at both time points. Capsular tensile strength and thickness of the irradiated bare and AlloDerm capsules did not change between 3 and 12 weeks. Radiation increased inflammation of bare capsules at 12 weeks, but it was significantly reduced in irradiated AlloDerm capsules. The majority of irradiated bare capsules developed pseudoepithelium, whereas AlloDerm protected capsules from this transformation.
Conclusion: AlloDerm decreases radiation-related inflammation and delays or diminishes pseudoepithelium formation and thus may slow progression of capsular formation, fibrosis, and contraction.
Comment in
-
A new concept: biological barrier between raw wound area and silicone implants.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Oct;124(4):1368-1369. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b46224. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19935334 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):82-91. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab112d. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19568048
-
The effect of montelukast and antiadhesion barrier solution on the capsule formation after insertion of silicone implants in a white rat model.Eur Surg Res. 2013;51(3-4):146-55. doi: 10.1159/000356443. Epub 2013 Dec 20. Eur Surg Res. 2013. PMID: 24356183
-
Inhibition Mechanism of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Capsule Formation in Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(8):2279-2287. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6549-8. Epub 2018 May 31. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29855829
-
The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part II. A cost analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2245-2254. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131c6b. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21617459 Review.
-
The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2232-2244. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131c56. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21617458 Review.
Cited by
-
Complete Implant Wrapping with Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):1575-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02826-6. Epub 2022 Mar 29. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35352159 Free PMC article.
-
Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Nov;73(11):1100-1106. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350930. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013. PMID: 24771895 Free PMC article.
-
Human-Mimic Submuscular and Premuscular Irradiated Rat Model: Histologic Characteristics of the Capsule Tissue in Contact with the Breast Implant.Breast J. 2023 Nov 9;2023:4363272. doi: 10.1155/2023/4363272. eCollection 2023. Breast J. 2023. PMID: 38021220 Free PMC article.
-
Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr 21;14:121. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0874-9. World J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27102580 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Research progress of non-biological meshes for breast reconstruction].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Sep 15;31(9):1141-1145. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201702073. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 29798576 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
References
-
- Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA. Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: A multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2143–2151.
-
- Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: Recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:930–942.
-
- Handel N, Lewinsky B, Jensen JA, et al. Breast conservation therapy after augmentation mammaplasty: Is it appropriate? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:1216–1224.
-
- Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: Six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:30–36.
-
- Burkhardt BR, Eades E. The effect of Biocell texturing and povidone-iodine irrigation on capsular contracture around saline-inflatable breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1317–1325.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical