Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;26(6):1369-77.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp052. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

A genomewide comparison of population structure at STRPs and nearby SNPs in humans

Affiliations

A genomewide comparison of population structure at STRPs and nearby SNPs in humans

Bret A Payseur et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Patterns of population structure provide insights into evolutionary processes and help identify groups of individuals for genotype-phenotype association studies. With increasing availability of polymorphic molecular markers across genomes, the examination of population structure using large numbers of unlinked loci has become a common practice in evolutionary biology and human genetics. The two classes of molecular variation most widely used for this purpose, short tandem repeat polymorphisms (STRPs) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), differ in mutational properties expected to affect population structure. To measure the relative ability of these loci to describe population structure, we compared diversity at neighboring STRPs and SNPs from 720 genomic regions in the four populations that comprise the Human HapMap. Comparing loci from the same genomic regions allowed us to focus on the contribution of mutational differences (rather than variation in genealogical history) to disparities in population structure between STRPs and SNPs. Relative to average values for SNPs from the same regions, STRPs had lower F(st), but higher G(st)' and I(n) values. STRP-SNP correlations in population structure across genomic regions were statistically significant but weak in magnitude. Separate analyses by repeat type showed that these correlations were driven primarily by tetranucleotide and trinucleotide STRPs; measures of population structure at dinucleotides and SNPs were not significantly correlated. Pairwise comparisons among populations revealed effects of divergence time on differences in population structure between STRPs and SNPs. Collectively, these results confirm that individual STRPs can provide more information about population structure than individual SNPs, but suggest that the difference in structure at STRPs and SNPs depends on local genealogical history. Our study motivates theoretical comparisons of population structure at loci with different mutational properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>IG</sc>. 1.—
FIG. 1.—
Histograms of Fst at STRPs and SNPs from the same genomic regions.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 2.—
FIG. 2.—
Histograms of Gst at STRPs and SNPs from the same genomic regions.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 3.—
FIG. 3.—
Histograms of In at STRPs and SNPs from the same genomic regions.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 4.—
FIG. 4.—
Scatterplots depicting relationships between STRP and SNP population structure. (A) Fst, (B) Gst, and (C) In.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 5.—
FIG. 5.—
Spearman's rank correlations between STRP and SNP population structure measures across genomic regions for pairs of populations. Population pairs are ordered from most recent to most ancient divergence time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adeyemo AA, Chen G, Chen Y, Rotimi C. Genetic structure in four West African population groups. BMC Genet. 2005;6:38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akey JM, Zhang G, Zhang K, Jin L, Shriver MD. Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res. 2002;12:1805–1814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:155–165. - PubMed
    1. Beaumont MA. Adaptation and speciation: what can F(st) tell us? Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:435–440. - PubMed
    1. Bustamante CD, Fledel-Alon A, Williamson S, et al. (13 co-authors) Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature. 2005;437:1153–1157. - PubMed

Publication types