Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;37(6):e43.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp040. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

Vectors expressing efficient RNA decoys achieve the long-term suppression of specific microRNA activity in mammalian cells

Affiliations

Vectors expressing efficient RNA decoys achieve the long-term suppression of specific microRNA activity in mammalian cells

Takeshi Haraguchi et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Whereas the strong and stable suppression of specific microRNA activity would be essential for the functional analysis of these molecules, and also for the development of therapeutic applications, effective inhibitory methods to achieve this have not yet been fully established. In our current study, we tested various RNA decoys which were designed to efficiently expose indigestible complementary RNAs to a specific miRNA molecule. These inhibitory RNAs were at the same time designed to be expressed in lentiviral vectors and to be transported into the cytoplasm after transcription by RNA polymerase III. We report the optimal conditions that we have established for the design of such RNA decoys (we term these molecules TuD RNAs; tough decoy RNAs). We finally demonstrate that TuD RNAs induce specific and strong biological effects and also show that TuD RNAs achieve the efficient and long-term-suppression of specific miRNAs for over 1 month in mammalian cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Structures of decoy RNAs for miR140-3p. The bold black curved arrow represents the miRNA-binding site (MBS) (5′ → 3′). The red lines represent the linkers in these molecules. (A) Structure of the prototype-decoy RNA (Decoy RNA #001-006). (B) Structures of Decoy RNA #002 and #007-013. I, II, III and IV indicate the stems present in these molecules. The lengths of each stem sequence (I, II, III and IV) for the Decoy RNA panel are shown in Table 2. (C) Structures of Decoy RNA #018–022. The lengths of linker sequence for the Decoy RNA panel are shown in Table 4. (D) Structures of Decoy RNA #013, 020 and 023. The MBS sequence for the Decoy RNA panel are shown in Table 5.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Representative structure of the TuD RNAs. (B) Schematic representation of the generation of TuD RNA expression cassettes driven by mouse U6 promoter. 80–90mer synthetic oligonucleotides pairs are annealed and cloned between the two BsmBI sites present in the BamHI–EcoRI fragment (the original cassette) to generate TuD RNA expression cassettes.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Generality, specificity and duration of the inhibitory effects of TuD RNA. (A) Effects of TuD-miR140-5p-4ntin or TuD-miR140-3p-4ntin on miR-140-3p activity detected by the GFP reporter cell system as shown in Table 1, except that the GFP expression levels were determined at 8–12 days post-transduction (Supplementary Figure S3D and E). (B) Effects of TuD-miR140-5p-4ntin or TuD-miR-140-3p-4ntin on miR-140-5p activity. HeLaS3 cells harbouring both the miR-140-5p reporter and the miR140-5p/140-3p vector were transduced with the lentivirus vectors expressing the corresponding TuD RNAs and the GFP expression levels were determined at 8–12 days post-transduction. The expression levels were normalized to those of HeLaS3 cells harbouring miR-140-5p reporter alone and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (C) Time course of the inhibitory effects of TuD-miR140-3p-4ntin on miR-140-3p activity. Relative GFP expression levels were determined as shown in Table 1. (D) Levels of mature miR-140-5p in the cells described in (B) determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The miR-140-5p expression levels were normalized to those of HeLaS3 cells harbouring both the miR-140-5p reporter and the miR140-5p/140-3p vector and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3). U6 snRNA was served as an endogenous control. (E) Analysis of the sub-cellular localization of TuD RNAs. The migration positions of Y4 small cytoplasmic RNA (Y4 scRNA, 93 nt) and ACA1 small nucleolar RNA (ACA1 snoRNA, 130 nt) on the same gel are indicated by black and open triangles, respectively. Y4 scRNA and ACA1 snoRNA were served as marker RNAs of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, respectively. Un, untransduced cells; 5p, TuD-miR140-5p-transduced cells; 3p, TuD-miR140-3p-transduced cells; N, nucleus; C, cytoplasm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Inhibitory effects of TuD RNA on endogenous miR-21 activity. TuD RNA expression plasmid vectors or LNA/DNA antisense oligonucleotides were transiently transfected into PA-1 (A) or HCT-116 (B) cells together with the Renilla luciferase miR-21 reporter (miR-21-RL) (open bars) or the untargeted control Renilla luciferase reporter (UT-RL) (black bars) as well as the Firefly luciferase reporter (FL) as a transfection control. After performing a dual luciferase assay, the expression levels were normalized to the ratio of the activity of miR-21-RL to that of FL in TuD-NC vector-transfected PA-1 (A) or HCT-116 (B) cells and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (C) Comparison of the inhibitory effects of TuD RNA and a conventional miRNA inhibitory vector. A dual luciferase assay was performed 72 h after transfection in HCT-116 cells. The ratio of miR-21-RL/FL to UT-RL/FL are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3) as the expression levels. (D) The levels of mature miR-21 in RNA from HCT-116 cells transfected with TuD-miR21 expression vectors determined by quantitative real time RT-PCR. The miR-21 expression levels were normalized to those of HCT-116 cells transfected with TuD-NC expression vector and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3). U6 snRNA was served as an endogenous control. (E) The levels of pre- and mature miR-21 in the same RNA samples as (D) determined by northern blotting. Y4 scRNA was served as a loading control.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Detection of TuD RNA molecules by northern blotting. TuD RNA expression plasmid vectors were transfected into PA-1 (A) or HCT-116 (B) cells and TuD-miR21-4ntin and TuD-miR21-pf were detected by northern blotting. The positions of Y4 scRNA (93 nt) and ACA1 snoRNA (130 nt) are indicated by black and open triangles, respectively. Y4 scRNA was served as a loading control.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Biological effects induced by TuD RNA. (A) Inhibition of endogenous miR-21 function induces growth suppression and apoptosis. Cell growth assay was performed after PA-1 cells were transduced with lentivirus vectors expressing either TuD-miR21-4ntin or TuD-NC at an MOI of 10. Cell proliferation was monitored by ATPase based assays and normalized to those of untransduced PA-1 cells on Day 0 and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Effects of transduced TuD RNA expression lentivirus vectors upon the expression of endogenous PDCD4 protein, a target of miR-21. PA-1 cells were transduced with the TuD RNA expression lentivirus vectors with an MOI of 10 and total proteins were prepared 20 h after transduction. PDCD4 (top) as well as the β-actin loading control (bottom) were detected by western blotting. (C) Caspase-3 + 7 activation was assayed 48 h after transduction with indicated TuD RNA expression lentivirus with an MOI of 2, 5 and 10. Caspase-3 + 7 activity levels/cell was normalized to that of untransduced PA-1 cells and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Inhibitory effects of TuD RNA on other family members of the target miRNA. (A) RNA sequences of miR-16, 195 and 497 and homology between them. Sequences shown in blue box are the heptameric seed sequence (2–8 from the 5′ end). Black bars indicated homologous nucleotides. (B) The imperfect pairing between miR-16 and MBSs of the corresponding TuD RNAs. Black dots indicate G-U pairs. (C) TuD RNA expression plasmid vectors were transiently transfected into HCT-116 cells together with the Renilla luciferase miR-16 reporter (open bars) or the untargeted control Renilla luciferase reporter (black bars) as well as the Firefly luciferase reporter as a transfection control. After performing a dual luciferase assay, the expression levels were normalized to the ratio of the activity of miR-16-RL to that of FL in TuD-NC vector-transfected cells and are represented by the mean ± SEM (n = 3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, Baek SH, Kim VN. MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2004;23:4051–4060. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fujita S, Ito T, Mizutani T, Minoguchi S, Yamamichi N, Sakurai K, Iba H. miR-21 Gene expression triggered by AP-1 is sustained through a double-negative feedback mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;378:492–504. - PubMed
    1. Fujita S, Iba H. Putative promoter regions of miRNA genes involved in evolutionarily conserved regulatory systems among vertebrates. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:303–308. - PubMed
    1. Li QJ, Chau J, Ebert PJ, Sylvester G, Min H, Liu G, Braich R, Manoharan M, Soutschek J, Skare P, et al. miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell. 2007;129:147–161. - PubMed
    1. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. - PubMed

Publication types