Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec 16:3:36.
doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-3-36.

Hardwiring of fine synaptic layers in the zebrafish visual pathway

Affiliations

Hardwiring of fine synaptic layers in the zebrafish visual pathway

Linda M Nevin et al. Neural Dev. .

Abstract

Background: Neuronal connections are often arranged in layers, which are divided into sublaminae harboring synapses with similar response properties. It is still debated how fine-grained synaptic layering is established during development. Here we investigated two stratified areas of the zebrafish visual pathway, the inner plexiform layer (IPL) of the retina and the neuropil of the optic tectum, and determined if activity is required for their organization.

Results: The IPL of 5-day-old zebrafish larvae is composed of at least nine sublaminae, comprising the connections between different types of amacrine, bipolar, and ganglion cells (ACs, BCs, GCs). These sublaminae were distinguished by their expression of cell type-specific transgenic fluorescent reporters and immunohistochemical markers, including protein kinase Cbeta (PKC), parvalbumin (Parv), zrf3, and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT). In the tectum, four retinal input layers abut a laminated array of neurites of tectal cells, which differentially express PKC and Parv. We investigated whether these patterns were affected by experimental disruptions of retinal activity in developing fish. Neither elimination of light inputs by dark rearing, nor a D, L-amino-phosphono-butyrate-induced reduction in the retinal response to light onset (but not offset) altered IPL or tectal lamination. Moreover, thorough elimination of chemical synaptic transmission with Botulinum toxin B left laminar synaptic arrays intact.

Conclusion: Our results call into question a role for activity-dependent mechanisms - instructive light signals, balanced on and off BC activity, Hebbian plasticity, or a permissive role for synaptic transmission - in the synaptic stratification we examined. We propose that genetically encoded cues are sufficient to target groups of neurites to synaptic layers in this vertebrate visual system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IPL organization of the larval zebrafish retina. Confocal images of horizontal sections of 5 dpf retina stained by immunohistochemistry or with DAPI (nuclear dye). IPL sublaminae are labeled (s10, s25, and so on). (A) DAPI stain shows the basic organization of the retina into GCL, IPL, INL, and ONL. (B-E) Neurites from Parv+ ACs (red) and Pou4f3:mGFP+ GCs (green) are closely apposed but reside in distinct sublaminae. (F-H) Neurites from ChAT+ ACs (red) overlap with zrf3 label (green) in the same sublaminae. (I-K) PKC+ BC axon terminals (red) and Pax6:mGFP+ AC neurites (green) each form three sublaminae that are closely nested but not co-localized. (L) Schematic of IPL organization. Cell types and their neurites are labeled according to the color code on the right. Space is shown between sublaminae for clarity. TH, tyrosine hydroxylase. Bottom left scale bar, for whole retina images, is 50 μm; bottom left scale bar in E, K is 25 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neuropil organization of the larval zebrafish optic tectum. Confocal images of horizontal sections of the 5 dpf tectum stained by immunohistochemistry or with DAPI. The neuropil of one lateral half of the tectum is shown. Rostral is up. (A) The Shh:GFP transgene labels all GCs, which innervate the SO, three sublaminae of the SFGS (labeled B, D, and F), the SGC, and the SAC/SPV border. (B) Parv+ tectal neurites form up to five laminae, within the SO, SFGS, SGC, and SAC. The thinnest Parv+ projection is just beneath the skin, superficial to the ShhGFP+ SO projection, likely corresponding to the stratum marginale (SM; most visible in C). (C) Parv+ neurites and GC axons co-localize in the SO and SFGS, but not in the deeper tectal layers. (D) Pou4f3:mGFP+ GC axons label the SO and two sublaminae (labeled D and F) of the SFGS. (E) PKC+ tectal neurites are most dense in three bands in SO, SFGS, and SGC. (F) Schematic showing organization of the tectal neuropil. Scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dark-reared, APB-treated, and BtTxB-injected larvae show proper IPL sublamination.(A-L) Sections showing the IPL of 5 dpf larvae raised in a normal light:dark cycle (A, E, I), constant darkness (B, F, J), in the presence of 1 mM APB (C, G, K), and treated with BtTxB (D, H, L). The images in D, H, L are from the larva recorded in Figure 4D. Insets: traces of the fluorescent signal intensity across the width of the IPL (region shown). Peaks correspond to bands in the IPL. (A-D) PKC+ BC axon terminals are confined to three inner sublaminae in all larvae. (E-H) Parv+ neurites are in three bands in all larvae. The interruption of the IPL in H is the optic nerve. (I-L) Pou4f3:mGFP+ dendrites stratify in five bands in all larvae. Scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Electroretinograms of APB- and BtTxB-treated larvae. Representative averaged traces of larval responses to a 1s pulse of bright light. Note that absolute voltage is a function of electrode placement on the eye; these traces are best interpreted by comparing the amplitude of the downward a-wave to the upward b-wave, and the on to the off response. (A, B) Responses of untreated control and 1 mM APB treated larvae, in μV. (C, D) Responses of uninjected control and BtTxB injected larvae, in μV. Time course of light step stimulus is shown at the lower left.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IPL sublaminae are consistently preserved in activity-deprived larvae.(A) A collection of Plot Profile traces representing IPL sublamination of different animals across all treatments (control, dark reared, APB, BtTxB; see Text). Each column corresponds to one rearing condition, shown at the top of the grid. (B) Quantification of the number of IPL sublaminae ('peaks' in a Plot Profile trace) observed for each of the three markers across the four rearing conditions. The number of PKC+ peaks was invariant; error bars for Parv+ and Pou4f3:mGFP+ peak numbers are 95% confidence intervals. Any significant difference between groups would generate non-overlapping error bars.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Quantitative analysis of IPL sublamination in activity-deprived larvae. Comparison of the mean locations, widths, and amplitudes of nine IPL bands across all treatments as in Figure 5. (A, D, G) Mean relative positions of PKC+ (top), Parv+ (middle), and Pou4f3:mGFP+ (bottom) sublaminae. The ordinate gives the distance from the inner edge of the IPL to the peak, divided by the total IPL width. (B, E, H) Mean widths of IPL sublaminae. The ordinate gives the width of the band (trough-to-trough on the densitometric trace) divided by the total IPL width, and therefore represents the fraction of the IPL covered by the given sublamina. (C, F, I) Mean relative amplitudes of the brightest pixels in each IPL band. The ordinate gives the amplitude (brightness) of the given peak divided by the maximum amplitude in the densitometric trace. All significant differences are labeled. Error bars show SEM.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Dark-reared, APB-treated, and BtTxB-injected larvae show proper GC axon targeting to tectal laminae. Horizontal sections of 5 dpf larval tecta showing Pou4f3:mGFP+ GC axons innervating the optic tectum, imaged by confocal microscopy. (A, C, E, G) Pou4f3:mGFP+ axons innervate the SO and two sublaminae of the SFGS. Insets: densitometric traces across the tectal neuropil, from superficial to deeper layers. (B, D, F, H) Same images of Pou4f3+ axons (green), with DAPI labeling (blue) to show the cell body and neuropil regions of the tectum. Scale bar 50 μm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Katz LC, Shatz CJ. Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science . 1996;274:1133–1138. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chalupa LM, Gunhan E. Development of On and Off retinal pathways and retinogeniculate projections. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004;23:31–51. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2003.10.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hahm JO, Cramer KS, Sur M. Pattern formation by retinal afferents in the ferret lateral geniculate nucleus: developmental segregation and the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J Comp Neurol. 1999;411:327–345. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990823)411:2<327::AID-CNE12>3.0.CO;2-#. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt JT, Buzzard M. Activity-driven sharpening of the retinotectal projection in goldfish: development under stroboscopic illumination prevents sharpening. J Neurobiol. 1993;24:384–399. doi: 10.1002/neu.480240310. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wyatt RM, Balice-Gordon RJ. Activity-dependent elimination of neuromuscular synapses. J Neurocytol. 2003;32:777–794. doi: 10.1023/B:NEUR.0000020623.62043.33. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources