Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework
- PMID: 18936255
- DOI: 10.1177/1524839908325267
Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework
Abstract
During a crisis, an open and empathetic style of communication that engenders the public's trust is the most effective when officials are attempting to galvanize the population to take a positive action or refrain from a harmful act. Although trust is imperative in a crisis, public suspicions of scientific experts and government are increasing for a variety of reasons, including access to more sources of conflicting information, a reduction in the use of scientific reasoning in decision making, and political infighting. Trust and credibility--which are demonstrated through empathy and caring, competence and expertise, honesty and openness, and dedication and commitment--are essential elements of persuasive communication.
Similar articles
-
Crisis and emergency risk communication in a pandemic: a model for building capacity and resilience of minority communities.Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):18S-25S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908324022. Health Promot Pract. 2008. PMID: 18936256
-
Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations.Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S324-32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537. Am J Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19797744 Free PMC article.
-
Action, not talk: a simulation of risk communication during the first hours of a pandemic.Health Promot Pract. 2008 Oct;9(4 Suppl):35S-44S. doi: 10.1177/1524839908322111. Health Promot Pract. 2008. PMID: 18936258
-
Non-pharmaceutical interventions.J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Aug;107(8):540-2. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009. PMID: 20112835 Review. No abstract available.
-
The 2009-2010 influenza pandemic: effects on pandemic and seasonal vaccine uptake and lessons learned for seasonal vaccination campaigns.Vaccine. 2010 Sep 7;28 Suppl 4:D3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.024. Vaccine. 2010. PMID: 20713258 Review.
Cited by
-
Political and personal reactions to COVID-19 during initial weeks of social distancing in the United States.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239693. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32970761 Free PMC article.
-
The Emergence of Risk Communication Networks and the Development of Citizen Health-Related Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Social Selection and Contagion Processes.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4148. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114148. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32532029 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating healthcare practitioners' attitudes towards the COVID-19 outbreak in Saudi Arabia: A general qualitative framework for managing the pandemic.Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;22:100491. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100491. Epub 2020 Dec 8. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021. PMID: 33319030 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal trajectories of coronavirus anxiety and health behavior use before and after the U.S. 2020 presidential election: The effects of political orientation.J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Dec;92:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102643. Epub 2022 Oct 17. J Anxiety Disord. 2022. PMID: 36283183 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative exploration of clinicians' strategies to communicate risks to patients in the complex reality of clinical practice.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0236751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236751. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32790675 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical