Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct 15;168(8):866-71.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn093. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Are lifetime abstainers the best control group in alcohol epidemiology? On the stability and validity of reported lifetime abstention

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Are lifetime abstainers the best control group in alcohol epidemiology? On the stability and validity of reported lifetime abstention

J Rehm et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Lifetime abstainers have often been recommended as the comparison group in alcohol epidemiology. The objective of this study was to provide insight into the validity and stability of lifetime abstention by using data derived from the National Alcohol Survey, a national probability survey of US households conducted in 1984, and its 2 follow-up surveys conducted in 1990 and 1992. Results indicated that more than half (52.9%; all proportions were weighted to represent the US population) of those who reported never having a drink of any alcoholic beverage in the 1992 survey reported drinking in previous surveys. Depending on assumptions, this difference may result in an underestimation of alcohol-attributable mortality of 2%-15% in men and 2%-22% in women. Sociodemographic factors differentiated those who consistently reported lifetime abstention across surveys from the rest of the study population. Results suggest that using reported lifetime abstainers as a sole comparison group is problematic, especially if reporting is based on 1 measurement only. Establishing multiple measurement points and including irregular lifetime light drinkers with lifetime abstainers as the comparison group are recommended for future epidemiologic studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, et al. The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease—an overview. Addiction. 2003;98(10):1209–1228. - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Room R, Monteiro M, et al. Alcohol use. In: Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, et al., editors. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks. Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Vol 1. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2004. pp. 959–1109.
    1. Corrao G, Bagnardi V, Zambon A, et al. A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and the risk of 15 diseases. Prev Med. 2004;38(5):613–619. - PubMed
    1. English D, Holman C, Milne E, et al. The Quantification of Drug Caused Morbidity and Mortality in Australia 1995. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health; 1995.
    1. Shaper AG, Wannamethee G, Walker M. Alcohol and mortality in British men: explaining the U-shaped curve. Lancet. 1998;2(8623):1267–1273. - PubMed

Publication types