Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;45(5):575-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates

Affiliations

Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates

Steven Z Rapcsak et al. Cortex. 2009 May.

Abstract

To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion-deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figures 1a and 1b. The influence of stimulus type on reading and spelling performance in perisylvian patients and normal controls.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lexicality and regularity effects in reading and spelling for perisylvian patients and controls.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The relationship between general phonological ability and reading/spelling performance for words and non-words in patients with perisylvian lesions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The close spatial overlap between the cortical regions that show activation in functional imaging studies of phonological processing in normal individuals and the lesions that produce phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia. Red circles indicate the cortical location of phonological activations derived from the meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of language by Vigneau et al., (2006). Regions were defined by creating 6-mm radius spheres centered on the mean x,y,z coordinates for the activation peaks. A = activations in posterior inferior frontal gyrus/Broca’s area and along the precentral gyrus; B and C= activations in superior temporal gyrus/Wernicke’s area and supramarginal gyrus. D = Frontal lesion in a patient with phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia involving regions of activation shown in A. E and F = temporo-parietal lesions in patients with phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia involving regions of activation shown in B and C.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander MP, Friedman RB, Loverso F, Fischer RS. Lesion localization in phonological agraphia. Brain and Language. 1992;43:83–95. - PubMed
    1. Allport DA, Funnell E. Components of the mental lexicon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1981;B295:397–410.
    1. Baayen RH, Piepenbrock R, van Rijn H. The CELEX Lexical Database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania; 1995.
    1. Baddeley A. Double dissociation: not magic but still useful. Cortex. 2003;39:129–131. - PubMed
    1. Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Dick F, Sereno MI, Knight RT, Dronkers NF. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nature Neuroscience. 2003;6:448–450. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources