Adjunctive techniques for oral cancer examination and lesion diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 18594075
- DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0276
Adjunctive techniques for oral cancer examination and lesion diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Background: Adjunctive techniques that may facilitate the early detection of oral premalignant and malignant lesions (OPML) have emerged in the past decades.
Methods: The authors undertook a systematic review of the English-language literature to evaluate the effectiveness of toluidine blue (TB), ViziLite Plus with TBlue (Zila Pharmaceuticals, Phoenix), ViziLite (Zila Pharmaceuticals), Microlux DL (AdDent, Danbury, Conn.), Orascoptic DK (Orascoptic, a Kerr Company, Middleton, Wis.), VELscope (LED Dental, White Rock, British Columbia, Canada) and OralCDx (Oral CDx Laboratories, Suffern, N.Y.) brush biopsy. They abstracted data relating to study design, sampling and characteristics of the study group, interventions, reported outcomes and diagnostic accuracy of adjunctive aids from 23 articles meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, including availability of histologic outcomes.
Results: The largest evidence base was for TB. A limited number of studies was available for ViziLite, ViziLite Plus with TBlue and OralCDx. Studies of VELscope have been conducted primarily to assess the margins of lesions in known OPML. The authors identified no studies of Microlux DL or Orascoptic DK. Study designs had various limitations in applicability to the general practice setting, including use of higher-risk populations and expert examiners.
Conclusions: There is evidence that TB is effective as a diagnostic adjunct for use in high-risk populations and suspicious mucosal lesions. OralCDx is useful in assessment of dysplastic changes in clinically suspicious lesions; however, there are insufficient data meeting the inclusion criteria to assess usefulness in innocuous mucosal lesions. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of visually based examination adjuncts. Practical Implications. Given the lack of data on the effectiveness of adjunctive cancer detection techniques in general dental practice settings, clinicians must rely on a thorough oral mucosal examination supported by specialty referral and/or tissue biopsy for OPML diagnosis.
Comment in
-
Cancer screening.J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Oct;139(10):1304, 1306; author reply 1306, 1308. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0033. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008. PMID: 18832263 No abstract available.
-
Oral cancer examination.J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Nov;139(11):1447-8; author reply 1448-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0059. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008. PMID: 18978376 No abstract available.
-
In the primary care setting, the value of adjunctive aids for oral cancer examinations remains unanswered (UT CAT #265).Tex Dent J. 2011 Oct;128(10):1102. Tex Dent J. 2011. PMID: 22206184 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A cross-sectional study evaluating chemiluminescence and autofluorescence in the detection of clinically innocuous precancerous and cancerous oral lesions.J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Feb;141(2):151-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0132. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010. PMID: 20123872 Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of oral lesion biopsies identified and evaluated by visual examination, chemiluminescence and toluidine blue.Oral Oncol. 2008 Jun;44(6):538-44. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Nov 8. Oral Oncol. 2008. PMID: 17996486
-
Adjunctive diagnostic aids in oral cancer screening: an update.Tex Dent J. 2012 May;129(5):471-80. Tex Dent J. 2012. PMID: 22779203
-
The use of light-based (optical) detection systems as adjuncts in the detection of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review.J Oral Pathol Med. 2015 May;44(5):307-28. doi: 10.1111/jop.12218. Epub 2014 Sep 3. J Oral Pathol Med. 2015. PMID: 25183259 Review.
-
Efficacy of light based detection systems for early detection of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: Systematic review.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jul 1;21(4):e447-55. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21104. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016. PMID: 26946209 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The application of vizilite in oral cancer.J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jan;7(1):185-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/5163.2704. Epub 2013 Jan 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013. PMID: 23450083 Free PMC article.
-
Theoretical Background to Automated Diagnosing of Oral Leukoplakia: A Preliminary Report.J Healthc Eng. 2020 Sep 13;2020:8831161. doi: 10.1155/2020/8831161. eCollection 2020. J Healthc Eng. 2020. PMID: 33005316 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a low-cost, portable imaging system for early detection of oral cancer.Head Neck Oncol. 2010 Apr 22;2:10. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-2-10. Head Neck Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20409347 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of autofluorescence imaging and histopathological investigation for oral potentially malignant disorders in Taiwan.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2395-2402. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2691-8. Epub 2018 Oct 9. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 30302607
-
Validation of the use of a fluorescent PARP1 inhibitor for the detection of oral, oropharyngeal and oesophageal epithelial cancers.Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Mar;4(3):272-285. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-0526-9. Epub 2020 Mar 12. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020. PMID: 32165735 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous