Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals
- PMID: 18347349
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00003
Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals
Abstract
Background: The effect of large-scale expanded surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on health care-associated MRSA disease is not known.
Objective: To examine the effect of 2 expanded surveillance interventions on MRSA disease.
Design: Observational study comparing rates of MRSA clinical disease during and after hospital admission in 3 consecutive periods: baseline (12 months), MRSA surveillance for all admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) (12 months), and universal MRSA surveillance for all hospital admissions (21 months).
Setting: A 3-hospital, 850-bed organization with approximately 40,000 annual admissions.
Intervention: Polymerase chain reaction-based nasal surveillance for MRSA followed by topical decolonization therapy and contact isolation of patients who tested positive for MRSA.
Measurements: Poisson and segmented regression models were used to compare prevalence density of hospital-associated clinical MRSA disease (bloodstream, respiratory, urinary tract, and surgical site) in each period. Rates of bloodstream disease with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were used as a control.
Results: The prevalence density of aggregate hospital-associated MRSA disease (all body sites) per 10,000 patient-days at baseline, during ICU surveillance, and during universal surveillance was 8.9 (95% CI, 7.6 to 10.4), 7.4 (CI, 6.1 to 9.0; P = 0.15 compared with baseline), and 3.9 (CI, 3.2 to 4.7; P < 0.001 compared with baseline and ICU surveillance), respectively. During universal surveillance, the prevalence density of MRSA infection at each body site had a statistically significant decrease compared with baseline. The methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia rate did not statistically significantly change during the 3 periods. In a segmented regression model, the aggregate hospital-associated MRSA disease prevalence density changed by -36.2% (CI, -65.4% to 9.8%; P = 0.17) from baseline to ICU surveillance and by -69.6% (CI, -89.2% to -19.6%]; P = 0.03) from baseline to universal surveillance. During universal surveillance, the MRSA disease rate decreased during hospitalization and in the 30 days after discharge; no further reduction occurred thereafter. Surveillance with clinical cultures would have identified 17.8% of actual MRSA patient-days, and ICU-based surveillance with polymerase chain reaction would have identified 33.3%.
Limitation: The findings rely on observational data.
Conclusion: The introduction of universal admission surveillance for MRSA was associated with a large reduction in MRSA disease during admission and 30 days after discharge.
Comment in
-
Expanding the universe of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevention.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):474-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18347352 No abstract available.
-
Benefits and drawbacks of universal surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 1;149(1):67-8; author reply 68-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00025. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18591645 No abstract available.
-
Benefits and drawbacks of universal surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 1;149(1):67; author reply 68-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00024. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18591646 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):I-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18347347 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 15;43(8):971-8. doi: 10.1086/507636. Epub 2006 Sep 14. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16983607
-
Summaries for patients. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):I-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18347347 No abstract available.
-
Nasal Iodophor Antiseptic vs Nasal Mupirocin Antibiotic in the Setting of Chlorhexidine Bathing to Prevent Infections in Adult ICUs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2023 Oct 10;330(14):1337-1347. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.17219. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37815567 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Has decolonization played a central role in the decline in UK methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission? A focus on evidence from intensive care.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 2:ii41-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq325. Epub 2010 Sep 18. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011. PMID: 20852273 Review.
-
MRSA patients: proven methods to treat colonization and infection.J Hosp Infect. 2001 Aug;48 Suppl A:S9-14. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(01)90005-2. J Hosp Infect. 2001. PMID: 11759035 Review.
Cited by
-
Colonization, pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and therapeutics for Staphylococcus aureus: what is the clinical relevance?Semin Immunopathol. 2012 Mar;34(2):185-200. doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0300-x. Epub 2011 Dec 11. Semin Immunopathol. 2012. PMID: 22160374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of rapid MRSA screening in surgical patients.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Nov;28(11):1291-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0778-5. Epub 2009 Aug 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009. PMID: 19669658
-
Quantifying cost-effectiveness of controlling nosocomial spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria: the case of MRSA.PLoS One. 2010 Jul 16;5(7):e11562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011562. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20661278 Free PMC article.
-
Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and subsequent infection in intensive care unit patients: does methicillin resistance matter?Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;31(6):584-91. doi: 10.1086/652530. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 20426656 Free PMC article.
-
Reductions in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile Infection and Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Bloodstream Infection Across the United Kingdom Following Implementation of a National Infection Control Campaign.Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 10;70(12):2530-2540. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz720. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31504311 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical