Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec 1;21(23):3085-94.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1609007. Epub 2007 Nov 14.

Novel pro- and anti-recombination activities of the Bloom's syndrome helicase

Dmitry V Bugreev  1 , Xiong Yu, Edward H Egelman, Alexander V Mazin
Affiliations

Novel pro- and anti-recombination activities of the Bloom's syndrome helicase

Dmitry V Bugreev et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Bloom's syndrome (BS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a strong cancer predisposition. The defining feature of BS is extreme genome instability. The gene mutated in Bloom's syndrome, BLM, encodes a DNA helicase (BLM) of the RecQ family. BLM plays a role in homologous recombination; however, its exact function remains controversial. Mutations in the BLM cause hyperrecombination between sister chromatids and homologous chromosomes, indicating an anti-recombination role. Conversely, other data show that BLM is required for recombination. It was previously shown that in vitro BLM helicase promotes disruption of recombination intermediates, regression of stalled replication forks, and dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Here, we demonstrate two novel activities of BLM: disruption of the Rad51-ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) filament, an active species that promotes homologous recombination, and stimulation of DNA repair synthesis. Using in vitro reconstitution reactions, we analyzed how different biochemical activities of BLM contribute to its functions in homologous recombination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
BLM inhibits DNA strand exchange activity of hRad51 protein by interaction with the hRad51-ssDNA filament. (A) The experimental scheme. The asterisk indicates the 32P label. (B) BLM (100 nM) was added to the hRad51 (lanes 1,2) or hDmc1 (lanes 4,5) nucleoprotein filaments assembled on ssDNA in the presence of 1 mM Mg2+. (Lane 3) In the control, BLM K695R (100 nM) was added to the hRad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament. D-loop formation was initiated by addition of 2 mM CaCl2 and pUC19 scDNA. (Lane 2) BLM inhibits D-loop formation, if added to the hRad51-ssDNA filament before Ca2+. In lanes 6 and 7, BLM (100 nM) was added to the hRad51-ssDNA filament formed in the presence of both 1 mM Mg2+ and 2 mM Ca2+. D-loop formation was initiated by addition of pUC19 scDNA. D-loops were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. (C) The results from B represented as a graph. (D) BLM in indicated concentrations was added to the nucleoprotein filaments formed by either hRad51 (lanes 1–7) or yeast Rad51 (lanes 8–12) proteins in the presence of Mg2+. D-loop formation was initiated by addition of either 2 mM CaCl2 (for hRad51) or 100 nM yeast Rad54 (for yeast Rad51) and pUC19 scDNA. (E) The results from D demonstrating inhibition of hRad51 by BLM are presented as a graph. Error bars in C and D indicate SEM.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
BLM promotes dissociation of the hRad51-ssDNA filament. (A) The experimental scheme of the restriction endonuclease protection assay. The asterisk indicates the 32P label. (B) The products of DNA cleavage were analyzed in a 10% polyacrylamide gel. BLM was added to the preformed hRad51-ssDNA filament, followed by addition of 32P-labeled dsDNA containing DdeI cleavage site. (Lanes 6–14) Protection against DdeI cleavage indicates the transfer of hRad51 from the nucleoprotein filament to the dsDNA probe (“hRad51-ssDNA”). In control, hRad51 was replaced by storage buffer (lanes 2–5, “no hRad51”), or reactions were carried out in the presence of AMP-PNP, a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog (lanes 15–17, “hRad51-ssDNA AMP-PNP”). Lane 1 shows migration of original dsDNA fragment noncleaved by DdeI. (C) The results from B presented as a graph. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Analysis of hRad51-ssDNA filament disruption by BLM using electron microscopy. (A) The hRad51-ssDNA filament (indicated by arrows) was formed and then mixed with hRPA. hRad51-ssDNA filament formed in the absence of hRPA is shown in the bottom left corner. (B) hRPA–ssDNA complexes (in the encircled area) are indicated by arrows. (C) The hRad51-ssDNA filament was formed and then mixed with BLM and hRPA. The reaction resulted in disruption of the filament and formation of hRPA–ssDNA complexes (indicated by arrows). Bar, 50 nm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
ATPase activity of BLM is stimulated by ssDNA stronger than by linear or supercoiled (sc) dsDNA. ATP hydrolysis was carried out in the presence of poly dT (black squares), ϕX174 ssDNA (open squares), pUC19 scDNA (closed circles), or pUC19 linear dsDNA (open circles), or without DNA (diamonds). Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
BLM promotes disruption of “native” D-loops containing hRad51. (A) The experimental scheme. The asterisk indicates the 32P label. (B) BLM cannot disrupt “native” D-loops in the presence of Ca2+. “Native” D-loops were formed by hRad51, and the reaction was initiated by addition of BLM (lane 2) or BLM storage buffer as a control (lane 1). The DNA products of D-loop disruption were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. (C) BLM (lanes 2–5) and hRad54 (lanes 6–9) can disrupt D-loops after Ca2+ removal. The protein concentrations are indicated above the gel. In lane 1, proteins were replaced by BLM storage buffer. (D) The data from C presented as a graph. Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
BLM promotes unwinding of a model replication fork and stimulates primer extension by DNA polymerase η. (A) The experimental scheme. The asterisk indicates the 32P label. (B) BLM shows a preference in unwinding of the displaced DNA strand versus the primer. The DNA products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 10% PAGE. The reactions were initiated by addition of BLM (10 nM) in the absence (lane 2) or presence (lane 3) of ATP. In controls, BLM was replaced by hRad54 (50 nM) (lane 4) or BLM storage buffer (lane 1). Migration of DNA markers is shown in lanes 5–7. (C) Schematic representation of replication fork extention by DNA polymerase η. The asterisk indicates the 32P label. (D) Effect of BLM (lanes 2–7) and hRad54 (lanes 8–15) in indicated concentrations on replication fork extension by DNA polymerase η. Lane 1 shows migration of a nonextended primer. The products of DNA synthesis were analyzed by denaturing PAGE.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The role of BLM helicase in HR and in stalled replication fork repair. (A) By disruption of the Rad51-filament (top) BLM suppresses HR and promotes alternative repair mechanisms such as “template switching,” which involves replication fork regression (formation of the “chicken foot” structures) (bottom). (B) BLM disrupts Rad51 presynaptic filament, or D-loops, when HR cannot proceed further, preventing formation of potentially toxic intermediates and channeling DSBR into other pathways. (C) In D-loops, BLM stimulates primer extension by DNA polymerase η by unwinding DNA template ahead of the DNA polymerase. (Top) BLM-associated proteins, Topo IIIα and BLAP75, may facilitate this process by removing topological constraints that arise during BLM unwinding. (Bottom) BLM, by promoting D-loop disruption, channels DNA repair process into the SDSA pathway. (D) BLM–Topo IIIα–BLAP75 complex promotes resolution of double Holliday junctions, preventing mitotic crossing over.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adams M.D., McVey M., Sekelsky J.J., McVey M., Sekelsky J.J., Sekelsky J.J. Drosophila BLM in double-strand break repair by synthesis-dependent strand annealing. Science. 2003;299:265–267. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal S., Tafel A.A., Kanaar R., Tafel A.A., Kanaar R., Kanaar R. DNA double-strand break repair and chromosome translocations. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2006;5:1075–1081. - PubMed
    1. Allers T., Lichten M., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 2001;106:47–57. - PubMed
    1. Amitani I., Baskin R.J., Kowalczykowski S.C., Baskin R.J., Kowalczykowski S.C., Kowalczykowski S.C. Visualization of Rad54, a chromatin remodeling protein, translocating on single DNA molecules. Mol. Cell. 2006;23:143–148. - PubMed
    1. Bachrati C.Z., Hickson I.D., Hickson I.D. RecQ helicases: Suppressors of tumorigenesis and premature aging. Biochem. J. 2003;374:577–606. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms