Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):369-75.
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252820.81313.9b.

Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in frontotemporal dementia

D J Libon  1 , S X Xie, P Moore, J Farmer, S Antani, G McCawley, K Cross, M Grossman
Affiliations

Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in frontotemporal dementia

D J Libon et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To differentiate frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes from each other and from probable Alzheimer disease (AD) using neuropsychological tests.

Methods: Patients with FTD and AD (n = 109) were studied with a comprehensive neuropsychological protocol at first contact. Data were subjected to a principal components analysis (PCA) to extract core neuropsychological features. A five-factor solution accounted for 72.89% of the variance and yielded factors related to declarative memory, working memory/visuoconstruction, processing speed/mental flexibility, lexical retrieval, and semantic memory.

Results: Between- and within-group analyses revealed that patients with AD obtain their lowest scores on tests of declarative memory while semantic dementia (SemD) patients are particularly disadvantaged on tests of semantic memory. On tests of processing speed/mental flexibility time to completion was faster for social comportment/dysexecutive (SOC/EXEC) patients, but these patients made more errors on some tests. Patients with corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) were impaired on tests of working memory. Logistic regression analyses using factor scores successfully assigned FTD subgroups and AD patients into their respective diagnostic categories.

Conclusion: Patients with differing frontotemporal dementia phenotypes can be distinguished from each other and from Alzheimer disease using neuropsychological tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Non-Fluent Speech in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration.
    Ash S, Moore P, Vesely L, Gunawardena D, McMillan C, Anderson C, Avants B, Grossman M. Ash S, et al. J Neurolinguistics. 2009 Jul 1;22(4):370-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.001. J Neurolinguistics. 2009. PMID: 22180700 Free PMC article.
  • Executive resources.
    Gross RG, Grossman M. Gross RG, et al. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2010 Aug;16(4 Behavioral Neurology):140-52. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000368266.46038.0e. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2010. PMID: 22810519 Free PMC article.
  • Neurocognitive contributions to verbal fluency deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
    Libon DJ, McMillan C, Gunawardena D, Powers C, Massimo L, Khan A, Morgan B, Farag C, Richmond L, Weinstein J, Moore P, Coslett HB, Chatterjee A, Aguirre G, Grossman M. Libon DJ, et al. Neurology. 2009 Aug 18;73(7):535-42. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b2a4f5. Neurology. 2009. PMID: 19687454 Free PMC article.
  • Primary Progressive Aphasia and Stroke Aphasia.
    Grossman M, Irwin DJ. Grossman M, et al. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Jun;24(3, BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY):745-767. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000618. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018. PMID: 29851876 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degenerations--progress and challenges.
    Hu WT, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM. Hu WT, et al. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Dec;95(4):636-48. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 Apr 30. Prog Neurobiol. 2011. PMID: 21554923 Free PMC article. Review.
See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources