Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions
- PMID: 17238363
- PMCID: PMC1839740
Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions
Abstract
The paradigm of evidence-based medicine (EBM) recommends that physicians formulate clinical questions in terms of the problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. Together, these elements comprise a PICO frame. Although this framework was developed to facilitate the formulation of clinical queries, the ability of PICO structures to represent physicians' information needs has not been empirically investigated. This paper evaluates the adequacy and suitability of PICO frames as a knowledge representation by analyzing 59 real-world primary-care clinical questions. We discovered that only two questions in our corpus contain all four PICO elements, and that 37% of questions contain both intervention and outcome. Our study reveals prevalent structural patterns for the four types of clinical questions: therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology. We found that the PICO framework is primarily centered on therapy questions, and is less suitable for representing other types of clinical information needs. Challenges in mapping natural language questions into PICO structures are also discussed. Although we point out limitations of the PICO framework, our work as a whole reaffirms its value as a tool to assist physicians practicing EBM.
Similar articles
-
EBM+: Advancing Evidence-Based Medicine via two level automatic identification of Populations, Interventions, Outcomes in medical literature.Artif Intell Med. 2020 Aug;108:101949. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101949. Epub 2020 Aug 13. Artif Intell Med. 2020. PMID: 32972669
-
Using PICO to align medical evidence with MDs decision making models.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1057. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013. PMID: 23920831
-
[The PICO (Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) question].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2007 Apr;114(4):172-8. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2007. PMID: 17484414 Review. Dutch.
-
Aceso: PICO-guided Evidence Summarization on Medical Literature.IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Apr 3;PP. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2984704. Online ahead of print. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020. PMID: 32275627
-
[Experimental validation of the Evidence-Based Occupational Health paradigm and of the PICO model in the decision making process applied by occupational health physicians].Med Lav. 2004 Nov-Dec;95(6):423-30. Med Lav. 2004. PMID: 15732252 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
What is an estimand & how does it relate to quantifying the effect of treatment on patient-reported quality of life outcomes in clinical trials?J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Aug 24;4(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00218-5. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32833083 Free PMC article.
-
Automated extraction of reported statistical analyses: towards a logical representation of clinical trial literature.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:350-9. Epub 2012 Nov 3. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012. PMID: 23304305 Free PMC article.
-
Toxicity profile of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and thoracic radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1039020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039020. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36439117 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic Health Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity in Hispanic or Latino Adults: A Systematic Review of English and Spanish Studies.Diabetes Spectr. 2024 Winter;37(1):65-85. doi: 10.2337/ds22-0083. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Diabetes Spectr. 2024. PMID: 38385094
-
A rapid review exploring nurse-led memory clinics.Nurs Open. 2021 Jul;8(4):1538-1549. doi: 10.1002/nop2.688. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Nurs Open. 2021. PMID: 34102023 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources