Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions
- PMID: 17238363
- PMCID: PMC1839740
Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions
Abstract
The paradigm of evidence-based medicine (EBM) recommends that physicians formulate clinical questions in terms of the problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. Together, these elements comprise a PICO frame. Although this framework was developed to facilitate the formulation of clinical queries, the ability of PICO structures to represent physicians' information needs has not been empirically investigated. This paper evaluates the adequacy and suitability of PICO frames as a knowledge representation by analyzing 59 real-world primary-care clinical questions. We discovered that only two questions in our corpus contain all four PICO elements, and that 37% of questions contain both intervention and outcome. Our study reveals prevalent structural patterns for the four types of clinical questions: therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology. We found that the PICO framework is primarily centered on therapy questions, and is less suitable for representing other types of clinical information needs. Challenges in mapping natural language questions into PICO structures are also discussed. Although we point out limitations of the PICO framework, our work as a whole reaffirms its value as a tool to assist physicians practicing EBM.
Similar articles
-
EBM+: Advancing Evidence-Based Medicine via two level automatic identification of Populations, Interventions, Outcomes in medical literature.Artif Intell Med. 2020 Aug;108:101949. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101949. Epub 2020 Aug 13. Artif Intell Med. 2020. PMID: 32972669
-
Using PICO to align medical evidence with MDs decision making models.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1057. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013. PMID: 23920831
-
[The PICO (Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) question].Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2007 Apr;114(4):172-8. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2007. PMID: 17484414 Review. Dutch.
-
Aceso: PICO-guided Evidence Summarization on Medical Literature.IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Apr 3;PP. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2984704. Online ahead of print. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020. PMID: 32275627
-
[Experimental validation of the Evidence-Based Occupational Health paradigm and of the PICO model in the decision making process applied by occupational health physicians].Med Lav. 2004 Nov-Dec;95(6):423-30. Med Lav. 2004. PMID: 15732252 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Extracting PICO Sentences from Clinical Trial Reports using Supervised Distant Supervision.J Mach Learn Res. 2016;17:132. J Mach Learn Res. 2016. PMID: 27746703 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Adults after Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Providers.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):75-151. doi: 10.46292/sci2702-75. Epub 2021 May 24. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34108835 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Bone Regeneration Capabilities of Scaffolds Containing Chitosan and Nanometric Hydroxyapatite-Systematic Review Based on In Vivo Examinations.Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;9(8):503. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9080503. Biomimetics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39194482 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of different stent types in post-liver-transplant anastomotic biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):485-492. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0886. Epub 2024 Jun 14. Ann Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38974085 Free PMC article.
-
The aetiology of atypical bone health in individuals with Down syndrome.Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Nov 24;18(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01348-1. Arch Osteoporos. 2023. PMID: 37996656 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources