Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants
- PMID: 16639738
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21907
Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants
Abstract
Background: The generalizability of clinical trial results is questionable, because fewer than 5% of cancer patients participate. The authors examined the comparability of clinical trial participants and nonparticipants and the potential impact of differences.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 19,340 cancer patients who were diagnosed between January 1990 and December 1997 was characterized by trial participation. The distributions of prognostically important factors among trial participants were compared with the distributions among nonparticipants and the population of patients diagnosed during the same period in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population. The impact of these factors on survival was examined by using a Cox proportional hazards analysis.
Results: Trial participants were younger and had better performance status and fewer comorbid conditions compared with nonparticipants. However, participants were more likely to have locally advanced disease, positive lymph node status, poorly differentiated tumors, liver metastases, and multiple metastatic sites. The former factors were associated with significantly longer survival, whereas the later factors were associated with significantly shorter survival.
Conclusions: The lack of comparability between trial participants and nonparticipants called into question the generalizability of clinical trial results. Although selective recruitment for clinical trials is justified, the authors encourage the use of population-based trials of effectiveness in "all comers."
Copyright (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
Comment in
-
Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results.Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):341; author reply 342. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22390. Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17154187 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis.Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):165-74. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9587-1. Epub 2007 Sep 26. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. PMID: 17896141
-
Differences between participants and nonparticipants in an exercise trial for adults with rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug 15;51(4):593-600. doi: 10.1002/art.20531. Arthritis Rheum. 2004. PMID: 15334432 Clinical Trial.
-
The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2401-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23474. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18383515
-
Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1239-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18224663
-
A comparison of survival and disease-specific survival in surgically resected, lymph node-positive bronchioloalveolar carcinoma versus nonsmall cell lung cancer: implications for adjuvant therapy.Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;112(7):1547-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23289. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18260087
Cited by
-
Representativeness of Patients With Lung Cancer in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System.Perm J. 2024 Sep 16;28(3):13-22. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.028. Epub 2024 Jun 12. Perm J. 2024. PMID: 38980792 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a Population-Based Data Source to Examine National Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e223687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3687. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35315914 Free PMC article.
-
Generalizability of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rectal Cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Feb;26(2):453-465. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05192-x. Epub 2021 Nov 9. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022. PMID: 34755313
-
Comparison of survival outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):dju002. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju002. Epub 2014 Mar 13. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. PMID: 24627276 Free PMC article.
-
An examination of the influence of patient race and ethnicity on expressed interest in learning about cancer clinical trials.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan;134(1):115-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0263-4. Epub 2007 Jun 28. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 17598129
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical