Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;92(1):F11-4.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.090308. Epub 2006 Apr 4.

Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates

Affiliations

Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates

L K Smith et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the extent of socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of very preterm birth over the past decade.

Methods: Ecological study of all 549 618 births in the former Trent health region, UK, from 1 January 1994 to 31 December 2003. All singleton births of 22(+0) to 32(+6) weeks gestation (7 185 births) were identified from population surveys of neonatal services and stillbirths. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence of very preterm birth (22-32 weeks) and extremely preterm birth (22-28 weeks) by year of birth and decile of deprivation (child poverty section of the Index of Multiple Deprivation).

Results: Incidence of very preterm singleton birth rose from 11.9 per 1000 births in 1994 to 13.7 per 1000 births in 2003. Those from the most deprived decile were at nearly twice the risk of very preterm birth compared with those from the least deprived decile, with 16.4 per 1000 births in the most deprived decile compared with 8.5 per 1000 births in the least deprived decile (incidence rate ratio 1.94; 95% CI (1.73 to 2.17)). This deprivation gap remained unchanged throughout the 10-year period. The magnitude of socio-economic inequalities was the same for extremely preterm births (22-28 weeks incidence rate ratio 1.94; 95% CI (1.62 to 2.32)).

Conclusions: This large, unique dataset of very preterm births shows wide socio-economic inequalities that persist over time. These findings are likely to have consequences on the burden of long-term morbidity. Our research can assist future healthcare planning, the monitoring of socio-economic inequalities and the targeting of interventions in order to reduce this persistent deprivation gap.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tucker J, McGuire W. Epidemiology of preterm birth. BMJ 2004329675–678. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Draper E S, Manktelow B, Field D J.et al Prediction of survival for preterm births by weight and gestational age: retrospective population based study. BMJ 19993191093–1097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacDorman M F, Minino A M, Strobino D M.et al Annual summary of vital statistics—2001. Pediatrics 20021101037–1052. - PubMed
    1. Roberts C L, Algert C S, Raynes‐Greenow C.et al Delivery of singleton preterm infants in New South Wales, 1990–1997. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 20034332–37. - PubMed
    1. Moser K, Li L, Power C. Social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales: trends and implications for future population health. J Epidemiol Community Health 200357687–691. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types