Use of nuclear morphometry, gleason histologic scoring, clinical stage, and age to predict disease-free survival among patients with prostate cancer
- PMID: 1606538
- DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920701)70:1<161::aid-cncr2820700126>3.0.co;2-5
Use of nuclear morphometry, gleason histologic scoring, clinical stage, and age to predict disease-free survival among patients with prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: Currently, there are no accurate methods for predicting metastases or time to disease progression for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer after surgery.
Methods: In this report, histologic sections were studied from prostate cancer specimens from 100 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (clinical Stages A1 [9 cases], A2 [24 cases], B1 [27 cases], and B2 [40 cases]; pathologic Stages A1 [9 cases], A2 [22 cases], B [23 cases], C1 [8 cases], and D1 [38 cases]) to determine whether nuclear morphometry--when analyzed with clinical stage, pathologic parameters, and age in a multivariate fashion--would predict time to disease progression.
Results: These patients were treated with surgery alone for their clinically localized disease and were observed after surgery until disease progression or death. For each of the 100 specimens, 16 different mathematical descriptors described the shape of 150 nuclei. A series of 17 different statistical measurements were calculated to accurately describe the distribution, extremes, and variability within each descriptor. As univariate predictors, the variance of nuclear roundness, the mean of ellipticity, the Gleason score, age, and clinical stage were statistically significant predictors of disease progression when analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A prognostic factor score calculated with multivariate analysis of clinical stage, Gleason score, age, and variance of nuclear roundness separated the patients into three statistically distinct groups and predicted time to progression by the Kaplan-Meier life table and Cox proportional hazards analysis.
Conclusions: This prognostic factor score may aid in stratifying patients into high-risk and low-risk groups for testing adjuvant therapies for prostate cancer.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of nuclear morphometry and Gleason grade as a predictor of prognosis in stage A2 prostate cancer: a critical analysis.J Urol. 1989 Nov;142(5):1254-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39049-3. J Urol. 1989. PMID: 2810502
-
Ability to predict biochemical progression using Gleason score and a computer-generated quantitative nuclear grade derived from cancer cell nuclei.Urology. 1996 Nov;48(5):685-91. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00370-6. Urology. 1996. PMID: 8911509
-
Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;98(12):2583-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11852. Cancer. 2003. PMID: 14669277
-
Prediction of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in men with long-term follow-up postprostatectomy using quantitative nuclear morphometry.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jan;17(1):102-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0175. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008. PMID: 18199716
-
Quantitative nuclear grade (QNG): a new image analysis-based biomarker of clinically relevant nuclear structure alterations.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 2000;Suppl 35:151-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4644(2000)79:35+<151::aid-jcb1139>3.0.co;2-7. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 2000. PMID: 11389545 Review.
Cited by
-
Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.J Cancer. 2010 Oct 6;1:150-77. doi: 10.7150/jca.1.150. J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20975847 Free PMC article.
-
Future directions for unsealed source radionuclide therapy for bone metastases.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Oct;29(10):1271-5. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-0914-2. Epub 2002 Aug 16. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002. PMID: 12271406 No abstract available.
-
Molecular and genetic prognostic factors of prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2003 Sep;21(4):265-74. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0362-z. Epub 2003 Aug 9. World J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12910365 Review.
-
Circulating Tumor Cells: High-Throughput Imaging of CTCs and Bioinformatic Analysis.Recent Results Cancer Res. 2020;215:89-104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-26439-0_5. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2020. PMID: 31605225 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stereologically estimated mean nuclear volume of prostatic cancer is a reliable prognostic parameter.Br J Cancer. 1997;76(2):234-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.367. Br J Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9231924 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials