Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization?
- PMID: 15806550
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.20333
Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization?
Abstract
An appreciation of the comparative functions of the corticospinal tract is of direct relevance to the understanding of how results from animal models can advance knowledge of the human motor system and its disorders. Two critical functions of the corticospinal tract are discussed: first, the role of descending projections to the dorsal horn in the control of sensory afferent input, and second, the capacity of direct cortico-motoneuronal projections to support voluntary execution of skilled hand and finger movements. We stress that there are some important differences in corticospinal projections from different cortical regions within a particular species and that these projections support different functions. Therefore, any differences in the organization of corticospinal projections across species may well reflect differences in their functional roles. Such differences most likely reflect features of the sensorimotor behavior that are characteristic of that species. Insights into corticospinal function in different animal models are of direct relevance to understanding the human motor system, providing they are interpreted in relation to the functions they underpin in a given model. Studies in non-human primates will continue to be needed for understanding special features of the human motor system, including feed-forward control of skilled hand movements. These movements are often particularly vulnerable to neurological disease, including stroke, cerebral palsy, movement disorders, spinal injury, and motor neuron disease.
Similar articles
-
[The pyramidal tract. Recent anatomic and physiologic findings].Rev Neurol (Paris). 1984;140(5):309-29. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1984. PMID: 6379818 Review. French.
-
Spinal cord plasticity in response to unilateral inhibition of the rat motor cortex during development: changes to gene expression, muscle afferents and the ipsilateral corticospinal projection.Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2555-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03713.x. Eur J Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15548199
-
Transcallosal sensorimotor integration: effects of sensory input on cortical projections to the contralateral hand.Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):855-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Jan 30. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16448846
-
Bilateral corticospinal projections arise from each motor cortex in the macaque monkey: a quantitative study.J Comp Neurol. 2004 May 24;473(2):147-61. doi: 10.1002/cne.20051. J Comp Neurol. 2004. PMID: 15101086
-
Descending pathways in motor control.Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:195-218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125547. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18558853 Review.
Cited by
-
Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Cortical Hyper-Excitability in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Review.Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 27;11(5):549. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050549. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33925493 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcutaneous spinal stimulation provides characterization of neurological status in individuals with tetraplegia.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Nov 8:rs.3.rs-3513515. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3513515/v1. Res Sq. 2023. Update in: Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 6;13(1):21522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48811-0. PMID: 37986790 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Cortical excitability in a nonhuman primate model of TMS.Brain Stimul. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):19-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Brain Stimul. 2021. PMID: 33099045 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Multimodal cortical and subcortical exercise compared with treadmill training for spinal cord injury.PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0202130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202130. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30092092 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
From hand to mouth: monkeys require greater effort in motor preparation for voluntary control of vocalization than for manual actions.R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Nov 28;5(11):180879. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180879. eCollection 2018 Nov. R Soc Open Sci. 2018. PMID: 30564395 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources