Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan 19;25(3):614-8.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3476-04.2005.

Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration

Chris I Baker  1 , Eli Peli, Nicholas Knouf, Nancy G Kanwisher
Affiliations

Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration

Chris I Baker et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

Macular degeneration (MD), the leading cause of visual impairment in the developed world, damages the central retina, often obliterating foveal vision and severely disrupting everyday tasks such as reading, driving, and face recognition. In such cases, the macular damage eliminates the normal retinal input to a large region of visual cortex, comprising tens of square centimeters of surface area in each hemisphere, which is normally responsive only to foveal stimuli. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we asked whether this deprived cortex simply becomes inactive in subjects with MD, or whether it takes on new functional properties. In two adult MD subjects with extensive bilateral central retinal lesions, we found that parts of visual cortex (including primary visual cortex) that normally respond only to central visual stimuli are strongly activated by peripheral stimuli. Such activation was not observed (1) with visual stimuli presented to the position of the former fovea and (2) in control subjects with visual stimuli presented to corresponding parts of peripheral retina. These results demonstrate large-scale reorganization of visual processing in MD and will likely prove important in any effort to develop new strategies for rehabilitation of MD subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic diagram indicating visual fields in the left eyes of MD1 and MD2. Only the central 44 × 30° (deg) is shown. In MD1, all retina outside this region is functional; in MD2, some functional retina exists outside this region.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Activation of visual cortex (stimuli greater than baseline) in MD and control subjects (experiment 1). a, Ventral and medial views of inflated right hemisphere of MD1. b, Flattened occipital cortex of MD1 showing activation at the foveal confluence. For a schematic diagram showing the typical organization of visual cortex on the flattened brain, see supplementary Figure 3 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). c, Flattened occipital cortex of a control subject matched to MD1. Note the absence of positive activation at the foveal confluence for stimuli presented to peripheral retina (equivalent to MD1's PRL). d, Inflated right hemisphere of MD2. e, Flattened occipital cortex of the right hemisphere of MD2 showing activation in the foveal confluence. f, Flattened occipital cortex of a control subject matched to MD2. Note the absence of activation in the foveal confluence for stimuli presented to peripheral retina (equivalent to MD2's PRL). Arrows point to activations overlying cortex that would normally be responsive to peripheral stimuli presented at retinal locations corresponding to the PRLs. Scale bar, 20 mm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Visual activation in MD and control subjects to stimuli presented either at the fovea or at the PRL (experiment 2). a, Left hemisphere of MD1 and one control subject. Peripheral, but not foveal, stimuli elicited strong activation in foveal cortex in MD1. In contrast, foveal cortical activation was only observed with foveal presentation in the control subject. Scale bar, 10 mm. b, Time course of response in an anatomically defined ROI at the posterior end of the calcarine sulcus (dashed white outlines in a) in MD1 (top) and four control subjects (bottom). c, d, Average responses to peripheral stimuli in foveal cortical ROIs in MD and control subjects. For MD1 and controls, stimuli were presented at the midline, and data are shown from both hemispheres. For MD2 and controls, stimuli mainly landed in the left visual field, and data are shown for the right hemisphere only. Error bars indicate SE.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Amedi A, Raz N, Pianka P, Malach R, Zohary E (2003) Early “visual” cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind. Nat Neurosci 6: 758-766. - PubMed
    1. Andrews TJ, Halpern SD, Purves D (1997) Correlated size variations in human visual cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, and optic tract. J Neurosci 17: 2859-2868. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelucci A, Levitt JB, Walton EJ, Hupe JM, Bullier J, Lund JS (2002) Circuits for local and global signal integration in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 22: 8633-8646. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baseler HA, Brewer AA, Sharpe LT, Morland AB, Jagle H, Wandell BA (2002) Reorganization of human cortical maps caused by inherited photoreceptor abnormalities. Nat Neurosci 5: 364-370. - PubMed
    1. Burton H, Snyder AZ, Conturo TE, Akbudak E, Ollinger JM, Raichle ME (2002a) Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of Braille reading. J Neurophysiol 87: 589-607. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types