Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages
- PMID: 15518835
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.021
Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages
Abstract
Background: Multilevel cervical discectomy usually requires plate and screw fixation for maintaining the spinal curvature, and increasing the graft fusion rate. However, the use of plate and screw fixation may cause a few complications, such as screw breakage, screw pullout, esophagus perforation, and cord or nerve root injury. In this study, we try to use cages to replace plate function in multilevel cervical fusion.
Methods: From January 1997 to June 2001, there were 180 consecutive cases of multilevel cervical degenerative disease. We randomized them into three groups: Group A (60 patients) underwent anterior discectomy and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion, Group B (50 patients) underwent anterior discectomy, autogenous iliac crest graft (AICG) fusion and plate fixation, and Group C (70 patients) underwent anterior discectomy and AICG only. X-ray of cervical spine was taken every 3 months until fusion was complete. Spinal curvature was measured by lateral view of X-ray. The functional and working status were evaluated by Prolo scale. Blood loss and operation time were recorded, respectively.
Results: The total complication rates were 3.3%, 16%, and 54.3% in Groups A, B, and C respectively. The graft complications were evaluated by radiographic findings (graft collapse, nonunion, or dislodged graft). However, only 37.1% of patients (13/35) with graft complications had clinical symptoms (severe neck pain, radicular pain, or neurologic deficits). The fusion rate was better, and the time to fusion was sooner in Groups A and B than Group C, p < 0.001 (chi(2) test). PEEK cage is statistically better than plating group in total complications, p < 0.05. Graft collapse and nonunion were the major graft complications in Group C (AICG without plating). Screw pullout, and screw breakage were the main causes of plating complication. Blood loss was minimum in Group A, p < 0.05. Spinal lordosis increased by a mean of 4.61 +/- 2.93 mm and 1.68 +/- 5.02 mm in Groups A and B, respectively, but spinal kyphosis increased by a mean of -2.09 +/- 4.77 mm in Group C. Group A had a statistically better Prolo scale than Group C, p < 0.0001.
Conclusions: Both PEEK cage without plating and AICG with plating are good methods for interbody fusion in multilevel cervical degenerative diseases. They increase spinal lordosis and graft fusion rate, and cause fewer surgical complications. However, PEEK cage is preferred in our study for multilevel fusion, because it has the fewest complication rates and the least amount of blood loss.
Similar articles
-
Multilevel cervical fusion without plates, screws or autogenous iliac crest bone graft.J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Aug;14(8):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.02.026. Epub 2007 May 31. J Clin Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17543528
-
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.010. Spine J. 2004. PMID: 15541695
-
Cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis.Surg Neurol. 2005 Jun;63(6):497-503; discussion 503-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.10.016. Surg Neurol. 2005. PMID: 15936361 Clinical Trial.
-
Posterior plating of the cervical spine.J Spinal Disord. 1995 Apr;8(2):111-5. J Spinal Disord. 1995. PMID: 7606116 Review.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without instrumentation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):772-4; discussion 775. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000258846.86537.ad. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17414911 Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes Evaluation of Zero-Profile Devices Compared to Stand-Alone PEEK Cages for the Treatment of Three- and Four-Level Cervical Disc Disease.Cureus. 2016 Sep 10;8(9):e775. doi: 10.7759/cureus.775. Cureus. 2016. PMID: 27738574 Free PMC article.
-
Biphasic calcium phosphate contained within a polyetheretherketone cage with and without plating for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Orthop Surg. 2012 Aug;4(3):156-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00185.x. Orthop Surg. 2012. PMID: 22927149 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Different Osteobiologics in Terms of Imaging Modalities and Time Frames for Fusion Assessment in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):141S-162S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231157312. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38421332 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus plate-only open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of spinal stenosis in degenerative diseases.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1162-1172. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4878-5. Epub 2016 Nov 24. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27885472 Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical plate fracture: a rare complication.Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Mar 19;20:266. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.266.5818. eCollection 2015. Pan Afr Med J. 2015. PMID: 26161189 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical