Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep;364(9438):970-9.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17021-9.

Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial

Dharma S Manandhar  1 , David Osrin, Bhim Prasad Shrestha, Natasha Mesko, Joanna Morrison, Kirti Man Tumbahangphe, Suresh Tamang, Sushma Thapa, Dej Shrestha, Bidur Thapa, Jyoti Raj Shrestha, Angie Wade, Josephine Borghi, Hilary Standing, Madan Manandhar, Anthony M de L Costello; Members of the MIRA Makwanpur trial team
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial

Dharma S Manandhar et al. Lancet. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Neonatal deaths in developing countries make the largest contribution to global mortality in children younger than 5 years. 90% of deliveries in the poorest quintile of households happen at home. We postulated that a community-based participatory intervention could significantly reduce neonatal mortality rates.

Methods: We pair-matched 42 geopolitical clusters in Makwanpur district, Nepal, selected 12 pairs randomly, and randomly assigned one of each pair to intervention or control. In each intervention cluster (average population 7000), a female facilitator convened nine women's group meetings every month. The facilitator supported groups through an action-learning cycle in which they identified local perinatal problems and formulated strategies to address them. We monitored birth outcomes in a cohort of 28?931 women, of whom 8% joined the groups. The primary outcome was neonatal mortality rate. Other outcomes included stillbirths and maternal deaths, uptake of antenatal and delivery services, home care practices, infant morbidity, and health-care seeking. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN31137309.

Findings: From 2001 to 2003, the neonatal mortality rate was 26.2 per 1000 (76 deaths per 2899 livebirths) in intervention clusters compared with 36.9 per 1000 (119 deaths per 3226 livebirths) in controls (adjusted odds ratio 0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.94]). Stillbirth rates were similar in both groups. The maternal mortality ratio was 69 per 100000 (two deaths per 2899 livebirths) in intervention clusters compared with 341 per 100000 (11 deaths per 3226 livebirths) in control clusters (0.22 [0.05-0.90]). Women in intervention clusters were more likely to have antenatal care, institutional delivery, trained birth attendance, and hygienic care than were controls.

Interpretation: Birth outcomes in a poor rural population improved greatly through a low cost, potentially sustainable and scalable, participatory intervention with women's groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Influencing birth outcomes in Nepal.
    Morrow AL, Dawodu A. Morrow AL, et al. Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):914-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17036-0. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15364172 No abstract available.
  • Birth spacing and neonatal mortality.
    Shelton JD. Shelton JD. Lancet. 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4;365(9457):383; author reply 383-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17819-2. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 15680448 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources