A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses
- PMID: 1530753
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-1-78
A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses
Abstract
The extent to which a clinician should believe and act on the results of subgroup analyses of data from randomized trials or meta-analyses is controversial. Guidelines are provided in this paper for making these decisions. The strength of inference regarding a proposed difference in treatment effect among subgroups is dependent on the magnitude of the difference, the statistical significance of the difference, whether the hypothesis preceded or followed the analysis, whether the subgroup analysis was one of a small number of hypotheses tested, whether the difference was suggested by comparisons within or between studies, the consistency of the difference, and the existence of indirect evidence that supports the difference. Application of these guidelines will assist clinicians in making decisions regarding whether to base a treatment decision on overall results or on the results of a subgroup analysis.
Comment in
-
Subgroup analyses.Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 1;117(1):93-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-93_2. Ann Intern Med. 1992. PMID: 1596058 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
How to use a subgroup analysis: users' guide to the medical literature.JAMA. 2014 Jan 22-29;311(4):405-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285063. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24449319
-
[Roaming through methodology. IX. The interpretation of subgroup analyses].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Oct 10;142(41):2245-7. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998. PMID: 9864501 Dutch.
-
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):417-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 21669366
-
Meta-analysis of clinical trials: a consumer's guide.J Biopharm Stat. 1996 Nov;6(4):377-94. doi: 10.1080/10543409608835151. J Biopharm Stat. 1996. PMID: 8969975 Review.
-
Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.BMJ. 2012 Mar 15;344:e1553. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1553. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22422832 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of iron supplementation on maternal iron deficiency anemia does not differ by baseline anemia type among Tanzanian pregnant women without severe iron deficiency anemia.Eur J Nutr. 2023 Mar;62(2):987-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-03029-0. Epub 2022 Nov 8. Eur J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36344770 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16484270 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: not a standard of care.CMAJ. 2003 Apr 29;168(9):1145-6. CMAJ. 2003. PMID: 12719318 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Use of steroids for acute spinal cord injury must be reassessed.BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1224. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 11073527 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Dietary modifications for infantile colic.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 10;10(10):CD011029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011029.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30306546 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
