Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Jul 6:4:22.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-22.

Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase

Affiliations

Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase

I King Jordan et al. BMC Evol Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Gene duplication is an important mechanism that can lead to the emergence of new functions during evolution. The impact of duplication on the mode of gene evolution has been the subject of several theoretical and empirical comparative-genomic studies. It has been shown that, shortly after the duplication, genes seem to experience a considerable relaxation of purifying selection.

Results: Here we demonstrate two opposite effects of gene duplication on evolutionary rates. Sequence comparisons between paralogs show that, in accord with previous observations, a substantial acceleration in the evolution of paralogs occurs after duplication, presumably due to relaxation of purifying selection. The effect of gene duplication on evolutionary rate was also assessed by sequence comparison between orthologs that have paralogs (duplicates) and those that do not (singletons). It is shown that, in eukaryotes, duplicates, on average, evolve significantly slower than singletons. Eukaryotic ortholog evolutionary rates for duplicates are also negatively correlated with the number of paralogs per gene and the strength of selection between paralogs. A tally of annotated gene functions shows that duplicates tend to be enriched for proteins with known functions, particularly those involved in signaling and related cellular processes; by contrast, singletons include an over-abundance of poorly characterized proteins.

Conclusions: These results suggest that whether or not a gene duplicate is retained by selection depends critically on the pre-existing functional utility of the protein encoded by the ancestral singleton. Duplicates of genes of a higher biological import, which are subject to strong functional constraints on the sequence, are retained relatively more often. Thus, the evolutionary trajectory of duplicated genes appears to be determined by two opposing trends, namely, the post-duplication rate acceleration and the generally slow evolutionary rate owing to the high level of functional constraints.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average substitution levels, with 95% confidence intervals, for orthologous human-mouse sequence pairs with paralogs (duplicates – light gray bars) and with no paralogs (singletons – dark gray bars). The x-axis labels indicate comparisons where orthologous pairs were classified as duplicates or singletons based on three criteria: 1 – presence of a paralog in the human genome alone (Human), 2 – presence of a paralog in the mouse genome alone (Mouse) and 3 – presence of a paralog in the human or mouse genome (Human & Mouse). a – amino acid substitution levels calculated using the gamma correction for multiple substitutions. b – ratio of non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) nucleotide CDS substitutions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ortholog identification control. a – The symmetrical best BLAST hits approach may mis-identify orthologs in rare cases where there is an ancient gene duplication followed by differential loss of paralogs. b – The dS distributions before and after removal of human-mouse orthologous pairs with dS > 3 standard deviations from the mean (see Methods).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average amino acid substitution levels, with 95% confidence intervals, for orthologous pairs with paralogs (duplicates – light gray bars) and with no paralogs (singletons – dark gray bars). Species comparisons are shown on the x-axis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mapping of lineage-specific expansions to individual branches of phylogenetic trees. Shown for vertebrates (a) and yeasts (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Post-duplication relaxation of purifying selection in paralogs. a – Schematic illustrating the rationale for the comparison of dN/dS for human-mouse orthologs versus human paralogs. dN/dS levels were averaged for sets of proteins, related as shown, where the human paralogs duplicated after the human-mouse divergence. b – Average dN/dS leves, with 95% confidence intervals (y-axis), is plotted for human-mouse orthologs (diamonds) and human paralogs (squares). A series of increasing cut-offs based on the level of dS (x-axis) between human paralogs was employed so that each set is restricted to more and more distantly related paralogs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haldane JBS. The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution. Am Nat. 1933;67:5–19. doi: 10.1086/280465. - DOI
    1. Fisher RA. The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. Am Nat. 1928;62:115–126. doi: 10.1086/280193. - DOI
    1. Pauling L, Zuckerkandl E. Chemical paleogenetics: molecular restoration studies of extinct forms of life. Acta Chem Scand. 1963;17:S9–S16.
    1. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer-Verlag; 1970.
    1. Lynch M, Conery JS. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000;290:1151–1155. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources