The Precautionary Principle, epidemiology and the ethics of delay
- PMID: 15212202
The Precautionary Principle, epidemiology and the ethics of delay
Abstract
Ethics tells us: do good and do no harm and invokes the norms of justice, equity and respect for autonomy in protecting and promoting health and well-being. The Precautionary Principle, a contemporary re-definition of Bradford Hill's case for action, gives us a common sense rule for doing good by preventing harm to public health from delay: when in doubt about the presence of a hazard, there should be no doubt about its prevention or removal. It shifts the burden of proof from showing presence of risk to showing absence of risk, aims to do good by preventing harm, and subsumes the upstream strategies of the Driving Forces Pressure Stress Exposure Effect Action model and downstream strategies from molecular epidemiology for detection and prevention of risk. The Precautionary Principle has emerged because of the ethical import of delays in detection of risks to human health and the environment. Ethical principles, the Precautionary Principle, the DPSEEA model and molecular epidemiology all imply re-emphasizing epidemiology's classic role for early detection and prevention. Delays in recognizing risks from past exposures and acting on the findings (e.g., cigarette smoking and lung cancer, asbestos, organochlorines and endocrine disruption, radiofrequency, raised travel speeds) were examples of failures that were not only scientific, but ethical, since they resulted in preventable harm to exposed populations. These may delay results from, among other things, external and internal determinants of epidemiologic investigations of hazard and risk, including misuse of tests of statistical significance. Furthermore, applying the Precautionary Principle to ensure justice, equity, and respect for autonomy raises questions concerning the short-term costs of implementation to achieve long-term goals and the principles that guide compensation.
Similar articles
-
[The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].J Chir (Paris). 2001 Apr;138(2):68-80. J Chir (Paris). 2001. PMID: 11319454 French.
-
The ethical basis of the precautionary principle in health care decision making.Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Sep 1;207(2 Suppl):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.032. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005. PMID: 15993912 Review.
-
Implications of the Precautionary Principle: is it a threat to science?Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):153-61. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004. PMID: 15212219 Review.
-
[Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(5):969-93. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000. PMID: 11077719 French.
-
The Precautionary Principle: implications for risk management strategies.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):47-57. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004. PMID: 15212206 Review.
Cited by
-
COVID-19 in Children in the United States: Intensive Care Admissions, Estimated Total Infected, and Projected Numbers of Severe Pediatric Cases in 2020.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):325-333. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001190. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020. PMID: 32282440 Free PMC article.
-
In the Public Health Perspective, There Is Not a Rational Approach of E-Cigarette Use.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 15;209(6):761. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2208LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38271702 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Psychosocial sequelae of cannabis use and implications for policy: findings from the Christchurch Health and Development Study.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;50(9):1317-26. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1070-x. Epub 2015 May 26. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26006253 Review.
-
A position statement and practical guide to the use of particulate filtering facepiece respirators (N95, FFP2, or equivalent) for South African health workers exposed to respiratory pathogens including Mycobacterium tuberculosis and SARS-CoV-2.Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 22;27(4):10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i4.173. doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i4.173. eCollection 2021. Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34734176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Childhood vision screening in Canada: public health evidence and practice.Can J Public Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;103(1):40-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03404067. Can J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22338327 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous