Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

David Atkins et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Users of clinical practice guidelines and other recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the recommendations. Systematic and explicit methods of making judgments can reduce errors and improve communication. We have developed a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts. In this article we present a summary of our approach from the perspective of a guideline user. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation require consideration of the balance between benefits and harms, the quality of the evidence, translation of the evidence into specific circumstances, and the certainty of the baseline risk. It is also important to consider costs (resource utilisation) before making a recommendation. Inconsistencies among systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations reduce their potential to facilitate critical appraisal and improve communication of these judgments. Our system for guiding these complex judgments balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. CMAJ 1979;121: 1193-254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1986;89(suppl 2): 2-3S. - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Arch Intern Med 1986:146: 464-5. - PubMed
    1. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1989;95: 2-4S. - PubMed
    1. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Antithrombotic therapy consensus conference. Chest 1992;102(suppl 4): 305-11S. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms