Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 May;167(1):131-50.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.131.

Properties of unpaired DNA required for efficient silencing in Neurospora crassa

Affiliations

Properties of unpaired DNA required for efficient silencing in Neurospora crassa

Dong W Lee et al. Genetics. 2004 May.

Abstract

The presence of unpaired copies of a gene during meiosis triggers silencing of all copies of the gene in the diploid ascus cell of Neurospora. This phenomenon is called meiotic silencing and on the basis of genetic studies appears to be a post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) mechanism. Previously, meiotic silencing was defined to be induced by the presence of a DNA region lacking an identical segment in the homologous chromosome. However, the determinants of unpaired DNA remained a mystery. Using the Ascospore maturation-1 (Asm-1) gene, we defined what needs to be "unpaired" to silence a gene. For efficient silencing, an unpaired region of DNA needs to be of a sufficient size and contain homology to the reporter transcript. The greater the size of the loop and the larger the homology to the reporter transcript, the better the resulting meiotic silencing is. Conversely, regions not containing homology to the transcript, e.g., intergenic regions, did not silence the reporter. Surprisingly, unpaired fragments lacking a canonical promoter silenced the reporter. Additionally, we detected the unpairing-dependent loss of a transcript during meiotic silencing. Our observations further support a PTGS mechanism for meiotic silencing and offer insight into the evolutionary consequences resulting from this novel meiotic checkpoint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:579-613 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000 Dec;10(6):638-43 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):991-1003 - PubMed
    1. Trends Genet. 1997 Aug;13(8):296-301 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1996 Jul 12;86(1):103-13 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms