Developing optimal search strategies for detecting sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE
- PMID: 14728269
- PMCID: PMC1479983
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE
Abstract
Background: The gaining interest in the use of clinical prediction guides as an aid for helping clinicians make effective front-line decisions, together with the increasing emphasis on evidence-based practice, underscores the need for accurate identification of sound clinical prediction studies. Despite the growing use of clinical prediction guides, little work has been done on identifying optimal literature search filters for retrieving these types of studies. The current study extends our earlier work, on developing optimal search strategies, to include clinical prediction guides.
Objective: To develop optimal search strategies for detecting methodologically sound clinical prediction studies in MEDLINE in the publishing year 2000.
Design: Comparison of the retrieval performance of methodologic search strategies in MEDLINE with a manual review ("gold standard") of each article for each issue of 162 core health care journals for the year 2000.
Methods: 6 experienced research assistants who had been trained and intensively calibrated reviewed all issues of 162 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was classified for format, interest, purpose, and methodologic rigor. Search strategies were developed for all purpose categories, including studies of clinical prediction guides.
Main outcome measures: The sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, and accuracy of single and combinations of search terms.
Results: 39% of original studies classified as a clinical prediction guide were methodologically sound. Combinations of terms reached peak sensitivities of 95%. Compared with the best single term, a three-term strategy increased sensitivity for sound studies by 17% (absolute increase), but with some loss of specificity when sensitivity was maximized. When search terms were combined to optimize sensitivity and specificity, these values reached or were close to 90%.
Conclusion: Several search strategies can enhance the retrieval of sound clinical prediction studies.
Similar articles
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):311-6. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004. PMID: 15360825
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound causation studies in MEDLINE.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:719-23. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003. PMID: 14728267 Free PMC article.
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey.BMC Med. 2004 Jun 9;2:23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-23. BMC Med. 2004. PMID: 15189561 Free PMC article.
-
Search filters can find some but not all knowledge translation articles in MEDLINE: an analytic survey.J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):651-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.014. Epub 2012 Mar 16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22424986 Review.
-
Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives.J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.018. Epub 2005 Apr 18. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID: 15878469 Review.
Cited by
-
The McMaster Health Information Research Unit: Over a Quarter-Century of Health Informatics Supporting Evidence-Based Medicine.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 31;26:e58764. doi: 10.2196/58764. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39083765 Free PMC article.
-
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA).BMJ. 2023 May 3;381:e073538. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073538. BMJ. 2023. PMID: 37137496 Free PMC article.
-
Quality and transparency of reporting derivation and validation prognostic studies of recurrent stroke in patients with TIA and minor stroke: a systematic review.Diagn Progn Res. 2022 May 19;6(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00123-z. Diagn Progn Res. 2022. PMID: 35585563 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Deep Learning Approach to Refine the Identification of High-Quality Clinical Research Articles From the Biomedical Literature: Protocol for Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 29;10(11):e29398. doi: 10.2196/29398. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. PMID: 34847061 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing a literature surveillance strategy to retrieve sound overall prognosis and risk assessment model papers.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):766-771. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa232. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021. PMID: 33484123 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Laupacis A, Sekar N, Steill IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997;277:488–94. - PubMed
-
- Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:793–9. - PubMed
-
- Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA. 2002;287:2805–8. - PubMed
-
- Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Tugwell P. Problems in handling of clinical and research evidence by medical practitioners. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:1971–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources