Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jul 15;102(2):756-62.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2628. Epub 2003 Mar 27.

Graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative versus conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Marco Mielcarek  1 , Paul J Martin, Wendy Leisenring, Mary E D Flowers, David G Maloney, Brenda M Sandmaier, Michael B Maris, Rainer Storb
Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Graft-versus-host disease after nonmyeloablative versus conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Marco Mielcarek et al. Blood. .
Free article

Abstract

It is unknown whether the severity, timing, and quality of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be different after nonmyeloablative as compared with myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, GVHD incidence, morbidity of skin, liver, and gut, requirements for immunosuppressive therapy, and survival were retrospectively analyzed in 44 patients who underwent nonablative HSCT and 52 who underwent ablative HSCT (median ages, 56 and 54 years, respectively). The nonablative transplantation regimen consisted of low-dose total body irradiation (TBI), preceded in some patients by fludarabine administration and followed in all patients by immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine (CSP). Those who underwent myeloablative HSCT were prepared with different TBI- and non-TBI-containing regimens and received CSP plus methotrexate or MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD was lower after nonablative transplantation (64% vs 85%; P =.001), but there were no differences in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring treatment (73% vs 71%; P =.96). Nonablative transplantation was associated with the delayed initiation of steroid treatment for GVHD (0.95 months vs 3.0 months; P <.001) and with the use of fewer systemic immunosuppressants in the first 3 months after transplantation (P </=.04). This corresponded to more prevalent skin and more severe gut morbidity 6 to 12 months after nonablative transplantation. Our results show that nonablative HSCT is associated with a syndrome of acute GVHD occurring after day 100 in many patients. This "late-onset acute GVHD" should be taken into consideration in the design of prospective studies comparing GVHD resulting from the two types of transplantation procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms