Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Sep 15;16(18):2327-32.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1013502.

A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint

Affiliations

A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint

Patrick J Lupardus et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Using the Xenopus egg extract system, we investigated the involvement of DNA replication in activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. We show here that DNA damage slows replication in a checkpoint-independent manner and is accompanied by replication-dependent recruitment of ATR and Rad1 to chromatin. We also find that the replication proteins RPA and Polalpha accumulate on chromatin following DNA damage. Finally, damage-induced Chk1 phosphorylation and checkpoint arrest are abrogated when replication is inhibited. These data indicate that replication is required for activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and suggest a unifying model for ATR activation by diverse lesions during S phase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Replication is slowed in response to UV treatment. (A) Sperm nuclei (2000/μL) were mock-treated or UV-treated and added to Xenopus interphase extract in the presence (+caffeine) or absence (+buffer) of caffeine (4 mM), and the extract was divided into two samples. To assay replication, aliquots were removed from one sample at the given times, incubated with [α-32P]dCTP for 15 min, terminated, separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and analyzed by autoradiography. To assay phosphorylation of xChk1, an in vitro translated, [35S]methionine-labeled fragment of xChk1 (Chk1ΔKD) was added to the second sample (5% reaction volume). Nuclei were isolated from this sample at 100 min, then proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. (B) CSF extract (10 μL) was preincubated with recombinant geminin or an equal volume of buffer. The extract was then supplemented with [α-32P]dCTP and mock- or UV-treated sperm nuclei, incubated at room temperature for 100 min, and processed as described in A.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geminin blocks UV-induced accumulation of checkpoint and replication proteins on chromatin. (A) Binding of xATR, xRad1, and xORC2 to chromatin in interphase extract was assayed after mock, UV, or aphidicolin (APH) treatment. Chromatin (2000/μL) was isolated at the given time points, and chromatin-bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies to xATR, xRad1, or xORC2. (B) Chromatin binding of the p180 subunit of xPolα, xRPA70, and xORC2 was assayed after mock, UV, and aphidicolin treatment by Western blotting. Samples were treated and prepared as described in A. (C) Interphase extract was pretreated for 10 min with geminin (+gem) before addition of mock- or UV-treated chromatin (2000/μL). Chromatin was isolated after 100 min, and chromatin-bound proteins were analyzed as described above.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Loss of the DNA damage checkpoint response after inhibition of DNA replication. (A) Phosphorylation of xChk1 (Chk1ΔKD) in Xenopus interphase extract after geminin treatment. Mock-treated or UV-damaged sperm chromatin (2000/μL) was added to mock- or geminin-pretreated extract containing Chk1ΔKD, and samples were analyzed as described in Figure 1A. (B) Phosphorylation of xChk1 (Chk1ΔKD) in Xenopus interphase extract after p27 treatment. Mock-treated or UV-damaged sperm chromatin (2000/μL) was added to mock- or p27-pretreated extract containing Chk1ΔKD, and samples were analyzed as described in Figure 1A. (C) Phosphorylation of histone H1 in mock- or geminin-treated cytostatic-factor-arrested (CSF) extract. CSF extract pretreated with buffer or recombinant geminin was supplemented with mock- or UV-treated sperm nuclei and 1 mM CaCl2. At the indicated time points, samples were removed to assay histone H1 kinase activity. The time at which nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) was >50% is indicated by the bar above each panel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Activation of the MMS checkpoint is replication-dependent. (A) DNA replication is slowed after MMS damage. Chromatin was pretreated with MMS, and replication was assayed as described in Figure 1A. See Figure 1A for untreated control (+/−) caffeine. (B) Phosphorylation of xChk1ΔKD induced by MMS was assayed after treatment of the extract with the checkpoint kinase inhibitor caffeine (4 mM) or an xATR-neutralizing antibody (10% reaction volume) as described in Figure 1A. (C) Chromatin was isolated from mock- or geminin-treated extract containing mock- or MMS-treated chromatin after 100 min, and chromatin-bound proteins were analyzed as described in Figure 2. (D) MMS-induced phosphorylation of xChk1ΔKD was assayed after geminin treatment. Geminin-treated interphase extract was supplemented with xChk1ΔKD and sperm chromatin (3000/μL), and samples were harvested at 100 min. Sperm nuclei were treated with MMS prior to addition to the extract. (E) Histone H1 kinase activity and percentage of nuclear envelope breakdown (%NEB) were assayed in CSF extract at 160 min. Extract was pretreated with buffer or geminin, and sperm chromatin was mock-treated or treated with MMS prior to addition to extract.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A model for activation of the DNA damage checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. UV and MMS lesions do not activate the checkpoint prior to initiation of DNA replication. During DNA replication, we suggest that encounter of a polymerase with a lesion leads to slowing of replication. Accumulation of single-stranded DNA is followed by association of ATR and the Rad1 complex with a protein and/or nucleic acid structure that is dependent on the presence of RPA, Polα, and possibly additional downstream events. Activation of ATR and Chk1 phosphorylation follow.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abraham RT. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes & Dev. 2001;15:2177–2196. - PubMed
    1. Cliby WA, Roberts CJ, Cimprich KA, Stringer CM, Lamb JR, Schreiber SL, Friend SH. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 1998;17:159–169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cortez D, Guntuku S, Qin J, Elledge SJ. ATR and ATRIP: Partners in checkpoint signaling. Science. 2001;294:1713–1716. - PubMed
    1. D'Urso G, Grallert B, Nurse P. DNA polymerase α, a component of the replication initiation complex, is essential for the checkpoint coupling S phase to mitosis in fission yeast. J Cell Sci. 1995;108:3109–3118. - PubMed
    1. Furstenthal L, Kaiser BK, Swanson C, Jackson PK. Cyclin E uses Cdc6 as a chromatin-associated receptor required for DNA replication. J Cell Biol. 2001;152:1267–1278. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms