Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption
- PMID: 11220207
- DOI: 10.1068/p3104
Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption
Abstract
Findings from studies of visual memory and change detection have revealed a surprising inability to detect large changes to scenes from one view to the next ('change blindness'). When some form of disruption is introduced between an original and modified display, observers often fail to notice the change. This disruption can take many forms (e.g. an eye movement, a flashed blank screen, a blink, a cut in a motion picture, etc) with similar results. In all cases, the changes are sufficiently large that, were they to occur instantaneously, they would consistently be detected. Prior research on change blindness was predicated on the assumption that, in the absence of a visual disruption, the signal caused by the change would draw attention, leading to detection. In two experiments, we demonstrate that change blindness can occur even in the absence of a visual disruption. In one experiment, subjects actually detected more changes with a disruption than without one. When changes are sufficiently gradual, the visible change signal does not seem to draw attention, and large changes can go undetected. The findings are discussed in the context of metacognitive beliefs about change detection and the strategic decisions those beliefs entail.
Similar articles
-
Failures to see: attentive blank stares revealed by change blindness.Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):877-86. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Oct 10. Conscious Cogn. 2008. PMID: 17931887
-
False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: the role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness.Conscious Cogn. 2002 Dec;11(4):507-27. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8100(02)00020-x. Conscious Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12470620
-
Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.Conscious Cogn. 2002 Mar;11(1):78-97. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0533. Conscious Cogn. 2002. PMID: 11883989 Clinical Trial.
-
Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing.Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1469-87. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00003-1. Vision Res. 2000. PMID: 10788653 Review.
-
Change blindness: past, present, and future.Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan;9(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.006. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005. PMID: 15639436 Review.
Cited by
-
More than words: can free reports adequately measure the richness of perception?Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Oct 23;2024(1):niae035. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae035. eCollection 2024. Neurosci Conscious. 2024. PMID: 39445136 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic change detection: Mismatch negativity and the now-classic Rensink, O'Reagan, and Clark (1997) stimuli.Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:975714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975714. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36092095 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping visual attention with change blindness: new directions for a new method.Cogn Sci. 2004;28(2):241-258. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.12.002. Cogn Sci. 2004. PMID: 18797511 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatiochromatic filters.Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):533-55. doi: 10.3758/bf03196516. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 14620348
-
The hazards of perception: evaluating a change blindness demonstration within a real-world driver education course.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 May 21;4(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0165-4. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019. PMID: 31115742 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical