DNA binding specificity of different STAT proteins. Comparison of in vitro specificity with natural target sites
- PMID: 11053426
- DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M001748200
DNA binding specificity of different STAT proteins. Comparison of in vitro specificity with natural target sites
Abstract
STAT transcription factors are expressed in many cell types and bind to similar sequences. However, different STAT gene knock-outs show very distinct phenotypes. To determine whether differences between the binding specificities of STAT proteins account for these effects, we compared the sequences bound by STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. One sequence set was selected from random oligonucleotides by recombinant STAT1, STAT5A, or STAT6. For another set including many weak binding sites, we quantified the relative affinities to STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. We compared the results to the binding sites in natural STAT target genes identified by others. The experiments confirmed the similar specificity of different STAT proteins. Detailed analysis indicated that STAT5A specificity is more similar to that of STAT6 than that of STAT1, as expected from the evolutionary relationships. The preference of STAT6 for sites in which the half-palindromes (TTC) are separated by four nucleotides (N(4)) was confirmed, but analysis of weak binding sites showed that STAT6 binds fairly well to N(3) sites. As previously reported, STAT1 and STAT5 prefer N(3) sites; however, STAT5A, but not STAT1, weakly binds N(4) sites. None of the STATs bound to half-palindromes. There were no specificity differences between STAT5A and STAT5B.
Similar articles
-
A sequence of the CIS gene promoter interacts preferentially with two associated STAT5A dimers: a distinct biochemical difference between STAT5A and STAT5B.Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Oct;18(10):5852-60. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.10.5852. Mol Cell Biol. 1998. PMID: 9742102 Free PMC article.
-
A single amino acid in the DNA binding regions of STAT5A and STAT5B confers distinct DNA binding specificities.J Biol Chem. 1998 Dec 18;273(51):33936-41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.51.33936. J Biol Chem. 1998. PMID: 9852045
-
Distinct palindromic extensions of the 5'-TTC...GAA-3' motif allow STAT6 binding in vivo.FASEB J. 2003 Feb;17(2):304-6. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0482fje. Epub 2002 Dec 3. FASEB J. 2003. PMID: 12475891
-
Functional roles of STAT family proteins: lessons from knockout mice.Stem Cells. 1999;17(3):138-46. doi: 10.1002/stem.170138. Stem Cells. 1999. PMID: 10342556 Review.
-
Stat5a and Stat5b: fraternal twins of signal transduction and transcriptional activation.Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1999 Jun;10(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(99)00011-8. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1999. PMID: 10743504 Review.
Cited by
-
Notch1-STAT3-ETBR signaling axis controls reactive astrocyte proliferation after brain injury.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 14;112(28):8726-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501029112. Epub 2015 Jun 29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26124113 Free PMC article.
-
Upregulation of the Drosophila Friend of GATA gene U-shaped by JAK/STAT signaling maintains lymph gland prohemocyte potency.Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Nov;29(22):6086-96. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00244-09. Epub 2009 Sep 8. Mol Cell Biol. 2009. PMID: 19737914 Free PMC article.
-
Variable structure motifs for transcription factor binding sites.BMC Genomics. 2010 Jan 14;11:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-30. BMC Genomics. 2010. PMID: 20074339 Free PMC article.
-
STAT1 inhibits STAT3 activation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Nov 29;10:6517-6523. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S182105. eCollection 2018. Cancer Manag Res. 2018. PMID: 30555257 Free PMC article.
-
Kinetics of cytokine receptor trafficking determine signaling and functional selectivity.Elife. 2019 Nov 27;8:e49314. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49314. Elife. 2019. PMID: 31774398 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous