Most important lymph node information in gastric cancer: multivariate prognostic study
- PMID: 10947018
- DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0503-1
Most important lymph node information in gastric cancer: multivariate prognostic study
Abstract
Background: In gastric cancer, the level and number of lymph node metastases is useful for predicting survival, and there are several staging systems for lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study was to compare the several lymph node classifications and to clarify the most important lymph node information associated with prognosis using multivariate analysis.
Methods: A total of 106 patients with histologically node-positive gastric cancer treated by radical gastrectomy and extended lymph node dissection (D2, D3) were studied. The level of lymph node metastasis was categorized simply as Level I nodes (perigastric, No.1-6), Level II nodes (intermediate, No.7-9), and Level III nodes (distant, No.10-16), irrespective of the tumor location. The Level II nodes included lymph nodes along the left gastric artery, common hepatic artery, and celiac trunk.
Results: Overall 5-year survival rate was 51%. Univariate analysis showed that 5-year survival rate was significantly influenced by the level of positive nodes (P < .01), total number of positive nodes (P < .01), number of positive Level I nodes (P < .01), and number of positive Level II nodes (P < .01), in addition to the tumor location (P < .05), tumor size (P < .05), gross type (P < .01), and depth of wall invasion (P < .01). Of these, independent prognostic factors associated with 5-year survival rate were the number of positive Level II nodes (0-1 vs. > or =2) (62% vs. 19%, P < .01) and the depth of wall invasion (within vs. beyond muscularis) (79% vs. 43%, P < .01).
Conclusions: Among several staging systems for lymph node metastases, the number of positive Level II nodes provided the most powerful prognostic information in patients with node-positive gastric cancer. When there were two or more metastases in the Level II nodes, prognosis was poor even after D2 or D3 gastrectomy.
Similar articles
-
[Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):190-194. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28226354 Chinese.
-
[Analysis of risk factors and prognosis of No.8p lymph node metastasis in cases with advanced gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):218-223. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28226359 Chinese.
-
Perigastric lymph node status as a prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.Br J Surg. 1998 Sep;85(9):1281-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00833.x. Br J Surg. 1998. PMID: 9752878
-
Multivariate prognostic study on large gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;96(1):14-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20631. J Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17582596 Review.
-
[Current status and research progress of lymph node dissection in advanced upper gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):236-240. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29492924 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Why the Proximal Splenic Artery Approach is the Ideal Approach for Laparoscopic Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Gastric Cancer? A Large-Scale Vascular-Anatomical-Based Study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e832. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000832. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 25950692 Free PMC article.
-
Curcumin suppresses lymphatic vessel density in an in vivo human gastric cancer model.Tumour Biol. 2015 Jul;36(7):5215-23. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3178-8. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Tumour Biol. 2015. PMID: 25874494
-
The anatomical configuration of the splenic artery influences suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy: analysis using a 3D volume rendering program.Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3697-3705. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6201-5. Epub 2018 May 3. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29725766
-
Comparison of colorectal and gastric cancer: survival and prognostic factors.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;15(1):18-23. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.43284. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19568550 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the latest TNM classification for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis on 94 D2 gastrectomies.World J Surg. 2002 Jun;26(6):672-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0288-9. Epub 2002 Mar 26. World J Surg. 2002. PMID: 12053217
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical