Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jun;1(2):75-81.
doi: 10.1038/10042.

Spatial control of actin polymerization during neutrophil chemotaxis

O D Weiner  1 , G Servant, M D Welch, T J Mitchison, J W Sedat, H R Bourne
Affiliations

Spatial control of actin polymerization during neutrophil chemotaxis

O D Weiner et al. Nat Cell Biol. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

Neutrophils respond to chemotactic stimuli by increasing the nucleation and polymerization of actin filaments, but the location and regulation of these processes are not well understood. Here, using a permeabilized-cell assay, we show that chemotactic stimuli cause neutrophils to organize many discrete sites of actin polymerization, the distribution of which is biased by external chemotactic gradients. Furthermore, the Arp2/3 complex, which can nucleate actin polymerization, dynamically redistributes to the region of living neutrophils that receives maximal chemotactic stimulation, and the least-extractable pool of the Arp2/3 complex co-localizes with sites of actin polymerization. Our observations indicate that chemoattractant-stimulated neutrophils may establish discrete foci of actin polymerization that are similar to those generated at the posterior surface of the intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. We propose that asymmetrical establishment and/or maintenance of sites of actin polymerization produces directional migration of neutrophils in response to chemotactic gradients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Polarization of a neutrophil in response to a gradient of chemoattractant
a–d, Nomarski images of an unpolarized neutrophil responding to a micropipette containing 10 μM FMLP (white circle) at a, 5 s, b, 30 s, c, 81 s, and d, 129 s.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of incorporation of TMR–actin in a chemoattractant-stimulated permeabilized neutrophil
a–c, Neutrophil exposed to a uniform concentration (20 nM) of FMLP for 60 s. Scale bar represents 5 μm. a, Phalloidin stain, representing pre-existing filaments and those that incorporated actin during the assay. Note that because phalloidin is excluded by some actin-binding proteins, such as cofilin, phalloidin staining does not necessarily represent all actin filaments. b, TMR–actin stain, representing newly incorporated TMR–actin only. c, Colour overlay, showing phalloidin stain in red and TMR–actin stain in green. Arrows in c indicate sites of new actin incorporation at the tips of finger-like actin bundles. d, A neutrophil stimulated and permeabilized as in a–c but in the presence of 0.2 μm cytochalasin D. Colour scheme is as in c. Arrowheads indicate the absence of TMR–actin incorporation at the tips of finger-like actin bundles. Perinuclear actin incorporation parallels the subcellular distribution of granules (data not shown). Because bright perinuclear but not pseudopodial TMR–actin incorporation is observed when cytochalasin D is present during the permeabilization reaction, we conclude that incorporation at the pseudopodial surface represents new actin polymerization and that perinuclear incorporation results from G-actin-binding proteins or structures, as has been reported for permeabilized fibroblasts. e, f, Three-dimensional reconstruction of the boxed region of the pseudopodium shown in c. The bottom two panels indicate the relative orientation of the region of the pseudopodium from c as it is rotated along its x-axis. The scale bar in e represents 2 μm. Scale bar in d represents 5 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of TMR–actin incorporation in a neutrophil with two pseudopodia
Images represent maximum-intensity projections of three-dimensional immunofluorescence data. a, Phalloidin staining, representing total actin. b, TMR–actin staining, representing newly incorporated actin. c, Colour overlay, with phalloidin staining in red and newly incorporated actin in green. Arrow indicates a pseudopodium with minimal new actin incorporation. Arrowhead indicates a pseudopodium that is predominant in terms of new actin incorporation. The intense perinuclear TMR–actin stain does not represent new actin polymerization (Fig. 2). Scale bar represents 5 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Response of neutrophils expressing Arp3–GFP to a stationary or moving chemotactic micropipette
a–e, Response to a stationary micropipette. f–j, Response to a motile micropipette. Images are single optical sections from near the bottom of a cell. a, Image taken immediately after exposing neutrophils to a chemotactic micropipette (white circle). b–e, Same group of neutrophils at b, 72 s, c, 166 s, d, 196 s, and e, 240 s of exposure to the chemotactic micropipette. f, A polarized neutrophil responding to a moving chemotactic micropipette (white circle). The white asterisk represents a fixed reference point. g–h, Same cell as that shown in f at g, 78 s, h, 109 s, l, 193 s, and j, 305 s of exposure to the micropipette. Scale bar represents 5 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Immunofluorescence localization of endogenous Arp2/3 complex and actin in human neutrophils and the relationship of Arp2/3 localization to sites of actin polymerization
Images are single optical sections from near the midsection of cell. a, Actin immunostaining. Scale bar represents 5 μm. b, p21–Arc immunostaining. c, Colour overlay, showing actin in red and p21–Arc in green. Arrowheads indicate the localization of p21–Arc at the tips of actin fingers. d–g, Detail of an actin finger, from a cell permeabilized in the presence of TMR–actin to detect sites of actin polymerization and then processed for p21–Arc and actin immunostaining. d, Anti-actin staining, showing pre-existing and newly incorporated actin filaments. Scale bar represents 0.5 μm. e, TMR–actin staining, showing newly incorporated actin. f, p21–Arc staining. g, Triple overlay of d–f, showing total actin shown in light blue, newly incorporated actin in red, and p21–Arc in green. The green staining co-localizes with red and appears yellow.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Model of actin polymerization in response to a chemotactic signal
Top, Nomarski images of an unpolarized neutrophil exposed to a chemotactic micropipette (just to left of field) for a, 5 s, b, 30 s, c, 81 s, and d, 129 s. Bottom, the model. a, A neutrophil exposed to a gradient of chemoattractant (purple concentric circles) generates an asymmetric distribution of polymerization foci. b–d, The force generated by polymerization of actin (red lines) propels the polymerization focus forward and pushes the membrane outwards. The preferential activation of polymerization foci nearest to the chemoattractant could result in directional migration of neutrophils in response to chemotactic gradients and would be consistent with the behaviour of the pseudopod in response to a changing direction of chemoattractant. Note that this figure represents a single optical section of a neutrophil responding to a chemotactic gradient; the three-dimensional organization of the sites of actin polymerization and actin projections is shown in Fig. 2e, f.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cano ML, Lauffenburger DA, Zigmond SH. Kinetic analysis of F-actin depolymerization in polymorphonuclear leukocyte lysates indicates that chemoattractant stimulation increases actin filament number without altering the filament length distribution. J Cell Biol. 1991;115:677–687. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zigmond SH. Mechanisms of sensing chemical gradients by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Nature. 1974;249:450–452. - PubMed
    1. Zigmond SH, Hirsch JG. Effects of cytochalasin B on polymorphonuclear leucocyte locomotion, phagocytosis and glycolysis. Exp Cell Res. 1972;73:383–393. - PubMed
    1. Watts RG, Crispens MA, Howard TH. A quantitative study of the role of F-actin in producing neutrophil shape. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;19:159–168. - PubMed
    1. Mullins RD, Heuser JA, Pollard TD. The interaction of Arp2/3 complex with actin: nucleation, high affinity pointed end capping, and formation of branching networks of filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6181–6186. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types