Effects on hemostatic variables of desogestrel- and gestodene-containing oral contraceptives in comparison with levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives: a review
- PMID: 9753311
- DOI: 10.1053/ob.1998.v179.a92633
Effects on hemostatic variables of desogestrel- and gestodene-containing oral contraceptives in comparison with levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives: a review
Abstract
In some studies third-generation oral contraceptives have been reported to be associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism than are second-generation oral contraceptives, whereas recent, more refined studies have not confirmed this. The reasons for the alleged differences are under discussion, and differential effects on hemostasis have been proposed. Eighteen studies comparing second- and third-generation oral contraceptives with respect to their effects on hemostasis were analyzed. Significant changes from baseline were reported for many variables with both second- and third-generation oral contraceptives without significant between-group differences. Also, in a combined analysis of nonsignificant changes, no consistent pattern of change emerged for any marker, with the exception of higher factor VII levels associated with third-generation oral contraceptives. However, factor VII is not related to venous thromboembolism risk. In addition, 1 cross-sectional study with an unvalidated assay reported a higher ratio of activated protein C sensitivity with third-generation oral contraceptives. Only 2 components of the hemostatic system (factor VII and activated protein C sensitivity ratio) emerged as potentially differentially affected by second- and third-generation oral contraceptives; the association with venous thromboembolism risk is questionable in the former case and unknown in the latter.
PIP: The initial finding of an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in users of third-generation oral contraceptives (OCs) has not been confirmed in recent, more methodologically refined studies. This article reviews 17 prospective studies with healthy volunteers and one cross-sectional study that compared second- and third-generation OCs in terms of their effects on markers of hemostasis. Significant changes from baseline were reported for many variables with both second- and third-generation OCs. For example, activated partial prothrombin clotting time, protein S, and tissue plasminogen activator and its inhibitor were reduced during OC treatment. However, none of the studies reported statistically significant differences between treatment groups for any of these markers. In a combined analysis of nonsignificant changes, no consistent pattern emerged for any coagulation or fibrinolysis parameter with the exception of higher factor VII levels (not related to venous thromboembolism risk) associated with third-generation formulations. The cross-sectional study with an unvalidated assay found a higher ratio of activated C protein sensitivity with third-generation OCs. Only two components of the hemostatic system--factor VII and activated protein C sensitivity ratio--emerged as potentially differentially affected by second- and third-generation OCs. The association with venous thromboembolism risk is questionable in the former cases and unknown in the latter.
Similar articles
-
Population-based study of risk of venous thromboembolism associated with various oral contraceptives.Lancet. 1997 Jan 11;349(9045):83-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07496-x. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 8996419
-
Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolic disease: the findings from database studies in the United Kingdom and Germany.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;179(3 Pt 2):S78-86. doi: 10.1053/ob.1998.v179.a92634. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9753314
-
Modern oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):707-15. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70168-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9322646 Review.
-
The effect of oestrogen dose and progestogen type on haemostatic changes in women taking low dose oral contraceptives.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Mar;103(3):261-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09716.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996. PMID: 8630312
-
Bias versus causality: interpreting recent evidence of oral contraceptive studies.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;179(3 Pt 2):S43-50. doi: 10.1053/ob.1998.v179.a93059. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9753310 Review.
Cited by
-
Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the combined dienogest/estradiol valerate contraceptive pill.Int J Womens Health. 2010 Aug 24;2:279-90. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S6954. Int J Womens Health. 2010. PMID: 21151673 Free PMC article.
-
Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms.Drugs. 2000 Oct;60(4):721-869. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060040-00003. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 11085198 Review.
-
Effects of low-dose combined oral contraceptives and protein S K196E mutation on anticoagulation factors: a prospective observational study.Int J Hematol. 2019 Jun;109(6):641-649. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02633-x. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Int J Hematol. 2019. PMID: 30891674
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical