Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Sep;42(9):2359-64.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.9.2359.

Absence of effect of rufloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in steady state

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Absence of effect of rufloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in steady state

M Kinzig-Schippers et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Sep.

Abstract

Several quinolone antibacterial agents are known to inhibit the metabolism of theophylline, with the potential to cause adverse events due to raised theophylline concentrations during coadministration. A randomized crossover study was therefore conducted with 12 healthy male volunteers (ages, 23 to 34 years; body weight, 64 to 101 kg) to evaluate a possible interaction between rufloxacin and theophylline. Both drugs were administered at steady state. Following the administration of an oral loading dose of 400 mg on day 1, rufloxacin was given orally at 200 mg once daily on days 2 to 7 during one period only. During both periods, 146 mg of theophylline was administered orally twice daily for 3 days (which were days 4 to 6 of the rufloxacin coadministration period) and intravenously once the next morning to test for an interaction. Theophylline and rufloxacin concentrations were measured by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, the pharmacokinetics of theophylline at steady state following administration of the last dose were calculated by compartment-model-independent methods. To compare the treatments, analysis of variance-based point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (given in parentheses) were calculated for the mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic parameters from the test (rufloxacin coadministration) over those from the reference (theophylline without rufloxacin) period. These were as follows: maximum concentration at steady state, 1.01 (0.96 to 1.07); area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, 0.98 (0.94 to 1.02); half-life, 0.99 (0.95 to 1.03); total clearance at steady state, 1. 02 (0.99 to 1.06); and volume of distribution in the elimination phase, 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05). In conclusion, rufloxacin did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics at steady state. Therefore, therapeutic coadministration of rufloxacin and theophylline is not expected to cause an increased incidence of theophylline-related adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Mean ± SD levels of theophylline in plasma following the administration of the last dose of theophylline after the administration of six multiple oral doses of 146 mg of theophylline twice daily and one intravenous infusion of theophylline ethylenediamine monohydrate equivalent to 146 mg of theophylline without and with steady-state coadministration of rufloxacin at 200 mg once daily (n = 12).
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Mean ± SD levels of rufloxacin in plasma following the administration of the last 200-mg dose of rufloxacin after the administration of multiple oral doses during steady-state coadministration of 146 mg of theophylline twice daily (n = 12). Rufloxacin administration was started with the administration of a loading dose of 400 mg (two tablets) on the first day. On days 2 to 6, 200 mg of rufloxacin was administered every morning. On day 7, the last 200-mg rufloxacin dose was administered 21.5 h after the administration of the previous rufloxacin dose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aguilar L, Gimenez M J, Costa J, Dal-Re R, Prieto J. Suspicion of quinolone active metabolite following discrepancy between predicted and experimental urine bactericidal activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:927–930. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batty K T, Davis T M, Ilett K F, Dusci L J, Langton S R. The effect of ciprofloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;39:305–311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benet L Z, Øie S, Schwartz J B. Design and optimization of dosage regimens; pharmacokinetic data. In: Hardman J G, Limbird L E, Molinoff P B, Ruddon R W, Gilman A G, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1996. pp. 1707–1792.
    1. Boerema J B J, Bach D, Jol C, Pahlmann W. Penetration of rufloxacin into human prostatic tissue and fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;28:547–554. - PubMed
    1. Bowles S K, Popowski Z, Ryback M J. Effect of norfloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics at steady state. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32:510–512. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources