A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening
- PMID: 8531970
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199601183340304
A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal-cancer screening
Abstract
Background: Hemoccult II, a widely used guaiac test for fecal occult blood, has a low sensitivity for detecting colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic patients at average risk. In such patients, the performance characteristics of screening tests developed to improve on Hemoccult II are not known.
Methods: A set of three fecal occult-blood tests--Hemoccult II; Hemoccult II Sensa, a more sensitive guaiac test; and HemeSelect, an immunochemical test for human hemoglobin--was mailed to all patients 50 years of age or older who were scheduled for personal health appraisals at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Oakland, California. The performance of each test and of a combination test (HemeSelect to confirm positive Hemoccult II Sensa results) was evaluated by identifying screened patients who had colorectal neoplasma (carcinoma or a polyp > or = 1 cm in diameter) in the two years after screening.
Results: Of the 10,702 eligible patients, 8104 (75.7 percent) had at least one interpretable sample and were screened on the basis of at least one test; 96 percent of these patients had complete two-year follow-up. The sensitivity of the tests for detecting carcinoma was lowest with Hemoccult II (37.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 19.7 to 54.6 percent), intermediate with the combination test (65.6 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 47.6 to 83.6 percent) and with HemeSelect (68.8 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 51.1 to 86.4 percent), and highest with Hemoccult II Sensa (79.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 64.3 to 94.5 percent). The specificity for detecting carcinoma was 86.7 percent with Hemoccult II Sensa, 94.4 percent with HemeSelect, 97.3 percent with the combination test, and 97.7 percent with Hemoccult II. HemeSelect and the combination test detected more colorectal carcinomas and polyps than Hemoccult II, with only slight increases in the number of colonoscopies needed.
Conclusions: HemeSelect and a combination test in which HemeSelect is used to confirm positive Hemoccult II Sensa results improve on Hemoccult II in screening patients for colorectal carcinoma.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1996 May-Jun;124(3):74
-
Improving the fecal occult-blood test.N Engl J Med. 1996 Jan 18;334(3):189-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601183340312. N Engl J Med. 1996. PMID: 8531978 No abstract available.
-
The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 29;344(13):1022; author reply 1023. N Engl J Med. 2001. PMID: 11280326 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A prospective multicenter evaluation of new fecal occult blood tests in patients undergoing colonoscopy.Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 May;95(5):1331-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02032.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000. PMID: 10811348
-
Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population.N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 23;351(26):2704-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033403. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15616205 Clinical Trial.
-
Colocare self-test versus Hemoccult II Sensa for fecal occult blood testing.Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Dec;90(12):2160-3. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995. PMID: 8540507 Clinical Trial.
-
A Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Fecal Occult Blood Tests with Different Test Characteristics in the Context of Annual Screening in the Medicare Population [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2003 Aug 9. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2003 Aug 9. PMID: 25905156 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Validity of new immunological human fecal hemoglobin and albumin tests in detecting colorectal neoplasms--an endoscopy-controlled study.Z Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;36(6):485-90. Z Gastroenterol. 1998. PMID: 9675833 Review.
Cited by
-
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;112(1):37-53. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.492. Epub 2016 Oct 18. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 27753435 Review.
-
Quantitative profiling of CpG island methylation in human stool for colorectal cancer detection.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1532-5. Epub 2012 Jul 13. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013. PMID: 22791128 Clinical Trial.
-
The sensitivity and specificity of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced colonic adenomas and cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Dec;27(12):1657-64. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1518-3. Epub 2012 Jun 14. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012. PMID: 22696204
-
Colorectal cancer screening by non-invasive metabolic biomarker fecal tumor M2-PK.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 21;12(43):7007-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i43.7007. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 17109496 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary Cysteine-Rich Protein 61 and Trefoil Factor 3 as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer.Transl Oncol. 2019 Mar;12(3):539-544. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Transl Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30611902 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical