Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 2):1990-3.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90940-0.

Contraceptive choices in women with coagulation disorders

Affiliations
Review

Contraceptive choices in women with coagulation disorders

P C Comp et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun.

Abstract

When compared with older reports on the thromboembolic effects of high-dose oral contraceptives, new studies with low-dose oral contraceptives have a significantly reduced risk of thromboembolism. In the absence of risk factors such as smoking or inherited disorders predisposing to thrombosis, the modern low-dose oral contraceptive (< 50 micrograms of estrogen) is a safe and effective choice for contraception in women without symptoms who have family histories of sporadic thromboembolism. An intrauterine device or some form of barrier method is recommended for women who have a personal history of venous thrombus disease. The low-dose oral contraceptive may be a good choice in women taking oral anticoagulants because of the risk of teratogenic effects of anticoagulants and the risks of intraperitoneal bleeding associated with ovulation. In addition, oral contraceptives help diminish the excessive menstrual bleeding often seen in these women.

PIP: Pregnancy and oral contraceptives (OCs) reduce the levels of the natural anticoagulant protein S and about 50% and 20%. respectively. Original work on the link between OCs and development of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism do not necessarily confirm an association, today since it included cohort studies of women using high estrogen OCs. Also, physicians tended to actively diagnose thrombophlebitis in women they knew were using OCs. Objective diagnostic measures, e.g., venography, were not used in the cohort studies. Decreased estrogen content of current OCs and a case control study design show the likelihood of thrombotic complications of OS use has decreased significantly. Women who have experienced an episode of venous thrombosis and are not on oral anticoagulation therapy should not use OCs, because as many of 30% experience a second episode. Women with a strong family history of thromboembolism and those with antiphospholipid antibodies who have experienced a thrombotic event should also not use OCs. Current or past use of low estrogen Ocs does not significantly increase the risk of myocardial infarction, but smoking does. Physicians doe not know, however, whether women who use an OC with at the most 30 mcg estrogen and who smoke are at greater risk than those who smoke but do not use OCs. Just one study suggests a possible association between OC use and mitral valve prolapse leading to a cerebrovascular accident. The likelihood of developing calf vein clots in women who use low-dose OCs appears to be reduced, if they use sequential compression stockings and subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin following surgery. Since OCs decrease the chance of serious bleeding during ovulation and of heavy menstrual flow, oral anticoagulation is not a contraindication to OC use. The risk of OC-associated thromboembolism is considerably lower than that of pregnancy-associated thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances