Contraceptive choices in women with coagulation disorders
- PMID: 8512043
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90940-0
Contraceptive choices in women with coagulation disorders
Abstract
When compared with older reports on the thromboembolic effects of high-dose oral contraceptives, new studies with low-dose oral contraceptives have a significantly reduced risk of thromboembolism. In the absence of risk factors such as smoking or inherited disorders predisposing to thrombosis, the modern low-dose oral contraceptive (< 50 micrograms of estrogen) is a safe and effective choice for contraception in women without symptoms who have family histories of sporadic thromboembolism. An intrauterine device or some form of barrier method is recommended for women who have a personal history of venous thrombus disease. The low-dose oral contraceptive may be a good choice in women taking oral anticoagulants because of the risk of teratogenic effects of anticoagulants and the risks of intraperitoneal bleeding associated with ovulation. In addition, oral contraceptives help diminish the excessive menstrual bleeding often seen in these women.
PIP: Pregnancy and oral contraceptives (OCs) reduce the levels of the natural anticoagulant protein S and about 50% and 20%. respectively. Original work on the link between OCs and development of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism do not necessarily confirm an association, today since it included cohort studies of women using high estrogen OCs. Also, physicians tended to actively diagnose thrombophlebitis in women they knew were using OCs. Objective diagnostic measures, e.g., venography, were not used in the cohort studies. Decreased estrogen content of current OCs and a case control study design show the likelihood of thrombotic complications of OS use has decreased significantly. Women who have experienced an episode of venous thrombosis and are not on oral anticoagulation therapy should not use OCs, because as many of 30% experience a second episode. Women with a strong family history of thromboembolism and those with antiphospholipid antibodies who have experienced a thrombotic event should also not use OCs. Current or past use of low estrogen Ocs does not significantly increase the risk of myocardial infarction, but smoking does. Physicians doe not know, however, whether women who use an OC with at the most 30 mcg estrogen and who smoke are at greater risk than those who smoke but do not use OCs. Just one study suggests a possible association between OC use and mitral valve prolapse leading to a cerebrovascular accident. The likelihood of developing calf vein clots in women who use low-dose OCs appears to be reduced, if they use sequential compression stockings and subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin following surgery. Since OCs decrease the chance of serious bleeding during ovulation and of heavy menstrual flow, oral anticoagulation is not a contraindication to OC use. The risk of OC-associated thromboembolism is considerably lower than that of pregnancy-associated thromboembolism.
Similar articles
-
Prescription contraceptives: countering the risks.Am Pharm. 1985 Sep;NS25(9):32-7. doi: 10.1016/s0160-3450(16)32830-6. Am Pharm. 1985. PMID: 4050670
-
Coagulation and anticoagulation effects of contraceptive steroids.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;170(5 Pt 2):1523-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)05014-3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8178901 Review.
-
Recent advances in understanding clotting and evaluating patients with recurrent thrombosis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct;167(4 Pt 2):1184-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90409-3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1415444 Review.
-
Estrogen and progestin components of oral contraceptives: relationship to vascular disease.Contraception. 1997 May;55(5):267-72. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00029-2. Contraception. 1997. PMID: 9220222 Review.
-
Oral contraception and coagulation.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Mar;28(1):73-83. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198528010-00009. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985. PMID: 3987135
Cited by
-
Family planning requirements in the adult congenital heart disease clinic.Heart. 1996 Jul;76(1):60-2. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.1.60. Heart. 1996. PMID: 8774329 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous