Are Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Endurance Tasks of Predictive Value? Findings in Trunk Muscles Require Special Attention
- PMID: 39449474
- PMCID: PMC11503329
- DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040180
Are Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Endurance Tasks of Predictive Value? Findings in Trunk Muscles Require Special Attention
Abstract
Background: Subjective rating scales of perceived exertion are often used to quantify effort levels during various endurance exercises, particularly submaximal tasks. The aim of the current study was to determine whether predictive conclusions can be drawn from perceived exertion levels surveyed at the start of defined submaximal endurance tasks. Methods: In this study, healthy participants performed a 10-min endurance task at 50% of their upper body weight, targeting either the back muscles (n = 47, 24 women) or abdominal muscles (n = 32, 17 women). At the end of each minute, participants were asked to rate their perceived exertion (RPE) using the 14-points Borg Scale. Based on their initial and final RPE levels, and for each muscle group separately, participants were divided into subgroups reflecting low (good start/good end) and high (bad start/bad end) strain levels. These values were then compared over the duration of the exercise. Comparisons of RPE levels between subgroups were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test for independent samples, with Bonferroni-Holm correction to account for multiple comparisons. Results: Overall, strain levels increased throughout the duration of the exercise. For the abdominal muscles, the difference between the two RPE groups remained constant over time: participants with good start/end ratings consistently showed different strain levels from those with bad start/end ratings, regardless of whether the grouping was based on initial or final exertion levels. In contrast, for the back muscles, the initial grouping showed a crossover in strain values: by the end of the task, participants in the good start group tended to report higher strain than those in the bad start group. No differences were found in initial RPE values when the grouping was based on final exertion levels. Conclusions: For endurance tasks involving the abdominal muscles, initial strain levels have strong predictive value, whereas this is not the case for the back muscles. Because back muscles are frequently loaded, continuous monitoring of RPE levels is necessary to prevent unexpected task failure, as initial RPE values are not predictive. In contrast, RPE values of 11 or higher on the 14-points Borg scale predict complete exhaustion or even premature task failure with high certainty for abdominal muscle exercises, while lower RPE levels indicate that exercise intensity can be increased.
Keywords: abdominal muscle; back muscles; fatiguing task; human; submaximal load level.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors were not involved in the study and publication progress.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Walking Predicts Endurance Independent of Physiological Effort in Older Women.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1340-1344. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003268. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 31524783 Free PMC article.
-
The validity of submaximal ratings of perceived exertion to predict one repetition maximum.J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Dec 1;8(4):567-73. eCollection 2009. J Sports Sci Med. 2009. PMID: 24149599 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Subjective Perceived Exertion at the Anaerobic Threshold with the Borg CR-10 Scale.J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Mar 1;10(1):130-6. eCollection 2011. J Sports Sci Med. 2011. PMID: 24149305 Free PMC article.
-
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: Scoping review of quantitative evidence.Gait Posture. 2021 Oct;90:167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 25. Gait Posture. 2021. PMID: 34492503 Review.
-
Impact of dehydration on perceived exertion during endurance exercise: A systematic review with meta-analysis.J Exerc Sci Fit. 2022 Jul;20(3):224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 13. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2022. PMID: 35601980 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials