Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 27;9(4):180.
doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040180.

Are Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Endurance Tasks of Predictive Value? Findings in Trunk Muscles Require Special Attention

Affiliations

Are Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Endurance Tasks of Predictive Value? Findings in Trunk Muscles Require Special Attention

Christoph Anders et al. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Subjective rating scales of perceived exertion are often used to quantify effort levels during various endurance exercises, particularly submaximal tasks. The aim of the current study was to determine whether predictive conclusions can be drawn from perceived exertion levels surveyed at the start of defined submaximal endurance tasks. Methods: In this study, healthy participants performed a 10-min endurance task at 50% of their upper body weight, targeting either the back muscles (n = 47, 24 women) or abdominal muscles (n = 32, 17 women). At the end of each minute, participants were asked to rate their perceived exertion (RPE) using the 14-points Borg Scale. Based on their initial and final RPE levels, and for each muscle group separately, participants were divided into subgroups reflecting low (good start/good end) and high (bad start/bad end) strain levels. These values were then compared over the duration of the exercise. Comparisons of RPE levels between subgroups were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test for independent samples, with Bonferroni-Holm correction to account for multiple comparisons. Results: Overall, strain levels increased throughout the duration of the exercise. For the abdominal muscles, the difference between the two RPE groups remained constant over time: participants with good start/end ratings consistently showed different strain levels from those with bad start/end ratings, regardless of whether the grouping was based on initial or final exertion levels. In contrast, for the back muscles, the initial grouping showed a crossover in strain values: by the end of the task, participants in the good start group tended to report higher strain than those in the bad start group. No differences were found in initial RPE values when the grouping was based on final exertion levels. Conclusions: For endurance tasks involving the abdominal muscles, initial strain levels have strong predictive value, whereas this is not the case for the back muscles. Because back muscles are frequently loaded, continuous monitoring of RPE levels is necessary to prevent unexpected task failure, as initial RPE values are not predictive. In contrast, RPE values of 11 or higher on the 14-points Borg scale predict complete exhaustion or even premature task failure with high certainty for abdominal muscle exercises, while lower RPE levels indicate that exercise intensity can be increased.

Keywords: abdominal muscle; back muscles; fatiguing task; human; submaximal load level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors were not involved in the study and publication progress.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants were positioned in the device at a 30° tilt angle (50% of upper body weight). (Left): backward tilt (Substudy II), (right): forward tilt (Substudy I). Please note that the feedback monitor for posture control is just in front of the participant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Normalized sEMG amplitudes for the investigated muscles at the beginning of the endurance task: (A) MVC-normalized sEMG amplitudes of abdominal and back muscles at a load of 50% upper body weight for the entire group. Horizontal bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between values. (B) Data for “good start” and “bad start” subgroups. (C) Data for “good end” and “bad end” subgroups. All data are displayed as median values with upper and lower quartile ranges. LO: longissimus muscle; MF: multifidus muscle; OE: external oblique muscle; OI: internal oblique muscle; RA: rectus abdominis muscle; sEMG: surface EMG.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences in ratings of perceived exertion between the “good start/end” and “bad start/end” subgroups during a 10-min isometric endurance test of abdominal and back muscles. Load level: 50% of upper body weight. Asterisks indicate significant differences between subgroups (p < 0.05), as determined by the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni-Holm correction (global significance level: p < 0.05).

Similar articles

References

    1. Luttmann A., Jäger M., Sökeland J., Laurig W. Electromyographical study on surgeons in urology. II Determination of muscular fatigue. Ergonomics. 1996;39:298–313. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964460. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dimitrov G.V., Arabadzhiev T.I., Hogrel J.Y., Dimitrova N.A. Simulation analysis of interference EMG during fatiguing voluntary contractions. Part II—Changes in amplitude and spectral characteristics. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2008;18:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dimitrova N.A., Dimitrov G.V. Interpretation of EMG changes with fatigue: Facts, pitfalls, and fallacies. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2003;13:13–36. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00083-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark B.C., Collier S.R., Manini T.M., Ploutz-Snyder L.L. Sex differences in muscle fatigability and activation patterns of the human quadriceps femoris. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;94:196–206. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1293-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Champagne A., Descarreaux M., Lafond D. Back and hip extensor muscles fatigue in healthy subjects: Task-dependency effect of two variants of the Sorensen test. Eur. Spine J. 2008;17:1721–1726. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0782-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources