A Systematic Review Exploring Empirical Pharmacogenomics Research Within Global Indigenous Populations
- PMID: 39435544
- PMCID: PMC11494250
- DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.70018
A Systematic Review Exploring Empirical Pharmacogenomics Research Within Global Indigenous Populations
Abstract
Background: This systematic review aims to highlight the scope of pharmacogenomics research within global Indigenous populations. This review also explores the barriers and facilitators of pharmacogenomics research within this population.
Methodology: A systematic review of literature was conducted to identify and present an understanding of current empirical evidence demonstrating the conduct of genomics or pharmacogenomics research within global Indigenous populations (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021257226). Using key search terms, relevant databases were searched for articles published between January 2010 and July 2022. Screening, data extraction, and analysis was conducted using well-defined inclusion criteria. Quality assessment and risk of bias appraisal was conducted using the mixed methods appraisal tool. Indigenous community engagement and participation in genomics research was assessed using the social-ecological framework.
Results: From the 427 articles identified, 77 articles met inclusion criteria and underwent full-text screening. Of these, 30 articles were included in the final review, with 16 being quantitative and 14 either qualitative or mixed methods studies. Most studies were conducted with native Indigenous populations from the United States of America (36%). Content analysis revealed that studies either explored genetic variations associated with disease in Indigenous populations (23%) or markers for drug metabolism (30%) or were designed to understand perspectives of genomics research within this population (47%). Perspectives included the exploration of the role of participants in research, benefits or outcomes achieved from participation in genomics research, and levels of Indigenous engagement and participation in genomics research.
Conclusions: This review highlights a growing gap in Indigenous genomics research globally. It presents several important considerations from Indigenous participants, identifying how researchers can co-create culturally safe and inclusive design, implementation, analysis, and subsequent outcomes of genomics research involving Indigenous people. Indigenous governance, self-determination and leadership is essential, with researchers required to be responsive to such fundamental partnerships for research to progress.
Keywords: genomics; indigenous genomics research; pharmacogenomics.
© 2024 The Author(s). Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice.BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 17;9(10):e015377. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015377. BMJ Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 39419593 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The cultural safety of research reports on primary healthcare use by Indigenous Peoples: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11314-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39085815 Free PMC article.
-
Genomics and inclusion of Indigenous peoples in high income countries.Hum Genet. 2023 Sep;142(9):1407-1416. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02587-5. Epub 2023 Jul 21. Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 37479894 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies . 2012. Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies. Acton, ACT: AIATSIS.
-
- Bayer, R. , and Galea S.. 2015. “Public Health in the Precision‐Medicine Era.” New England Journal of Medicine 373: 499–501. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous