Rodent models for oral microbiome research: considerations and challenges- a mini review
- PMID: 39421460
- PMCID: PMC11484444
- DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1439091
Rodent models for oral microbiome research: considerations and challenges- a mini review
Abstract
Rodent models have been commonly employed in oral microbiota research to investigate the relationship between bacteria and oral disease. Nevertheless, to apply the knowledge acquired from studies conducted on rodents to a human context, it is crucial to consider the significant spatial and temporal parallels and differences between the oral microbiota of mice and humans. Initially, we outline the comparative physiology and microbiology of the oral cavity of rodents and humans. Additionally, we highlight the strong correlation between the oral microbiome of rodents and genetic makeup, which is influenced by factors including vendor, husbandry practices, and environmental conditions. All of these factors potentially impact the replicability of studies on rodent microbiota and the resulting conclusions. Next, we direct our attention toward the diversity in the microbiome within mice models of disease and highlight the diversity that may potentially affect the characteristics of diseases and, in turn, alter the ability to replicate research findings and apply them to real-world situations. Furthermore, we explore the practicality of oral microbial models for complex oral microbial diseases in future investigations by examining the concept of gnotobiotic and germ-free mouse models. Finally, we stress the importance of investigating suitable techniques for characterizing and managing genetically modified organisms. Future research should consider these aspects to improve oral microbiome research's translational potential.
Keywords: in vivo; mice: mouse: rodents: animals; microbiome; microbiota; oral.
© 2024 Gopinath, Pandiar, Li and Panda.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Gnotobiotics: Past, present and future.Lab Anim. 2019 Jun;53(3):232-243. doi: 10.1177/0023677219836715. Lab Anim. 2019. PMID: 31096878 Review.
-
Microbiome Resilience despite a Profound Loss of Minority Microbiota following Clindamycin Challenge in Humanized Gnotobiotic Mice.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0196021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01960-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35019780 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic hypogonadal mouse model reveals niche-specific influence of reproductive axis and sex on intestinal microbial communities.Biol Sex Differ. 2023 Nov 6;14(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00564-1. Biol Sex Differ. 2023. PMID: 37932822 Free PMC article.
-
Gnotobiotic and Conventional Mouse Systems to Support Microbiota Based Studies.Curr Protoc Immunol. 2018 Apr;121(1):e48. doi: 10.1002/cpim.48. Epub 2018 Apr 16. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2018. PMID: 30008984 Free PMC article.
-
The mouse gut microbiome revisited: From complex diversity to model ecosystems.Int J Med Microbiol. 2016 Aug;306(5):316-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 5. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 26995267 Review.
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources