Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e0424623.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04246-23. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

Spatial variability of bacterial biofilm communities in a wastewater effluent-impacted suburban stream ecosystem

Affiliations

Spatial variability of bacterial biofilm communities in a wastewater effluent-impacted suburban stream ecosystem

Allison M Veach et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Wastewater discharge is a global threat to freshwater resources. Streams, in particular, are receiving waterbodies that are directly impacted chemically and biologically due to effluent discharge. However, it is largely unknown how wastewater serves as a subsidy or a stressor to aquatic biodiversity, particularly microbiota, over space. Nutrient-diffusing substrata (NDS) were deployed; NDS release nutrients through diffusion into the water column into a wastewater-dependent stream across three reaches. We used N, P, and N + P treatments for the measurement of single nutrient and co-nutrient limitation, and a no-nutrient control. Both algal and total biofilm biomass was measured and the 16S ribosomal RNA genes via targeted amplicon sequencing was used to assess bacterial/archaeal community diversity. Data indicated that total organic matter in biofilms differs spatially with the greatest organic matter (OM) concentrations in the confluence downstream of wastewater inputs. Biofilm OM concentrations were greatest in P and N + P treatments in the confluence site relative to control or N-only treatments. This indicates heterotrophic microbial communities-likely bacteria that dominate stream biofilms-are P-limited in this ecosystem even with upstream wastewater inputs. In conjunction, bacteria/archaeal communities differed the greatest among nutrient treatments versus spatially and had several indicator taxa belonging to Flavobacterium spp. in N treatments relative to controls. Collectively with historical water quality data, we conclude that this wastewater-fed stream is primarily N-enriched but potentially P-limited, which results in significant shifts in biofilm bacterial communities and likely their overall biomass in this urban watershed.

Importance: Streams in arid and semi-arid biomes are often dependent on their flow from municipal sources, such as wastewater effluent. However, wastewater has been shown to contain high concentrations of nutrients and chemical pollutants that can potentially harm aquatic ecosystems and their biota. Understanding if and the type of microorganisms that respond to pollution sources, specifically effluent from wastewater treatment facilities, in regions where flow is predominantly from treatment facilities, is critical for developing a predictive monitoring approach for eutrophication or other ecological degradation states for freshwaters.

Keywords: 16S rRNA; algal biomass; biofilm; lotic; nutrient-diffusing substrata; wastewater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Mean chlorophyll-a (A) and biofilm organic matter (B) on NDS discs incubated in three stream reaches impacted by wastewater effluent in Cibolo Creek in Boerne, TX, USA. Bars represent the mean (N = 4) ± 1 standard error for each nutrient agar treatment. White bars denote a control with no nutrients, yellow bars denote nitrogen amendments, green bars denote P amendments, and dark gray bars denote N + P amendments. Two-way ANOVA model statistics are provided for both response variables. Biofilm organic matter site pairwise differences are denoted by capital letters, and within site nutrient treatment differences are denoted by lowercase letters.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination (A) for bacterial/archaeal communities in stream biofilms amended with N (yellow), P (green), N + P (dark gray), or no nutrient control (light gray) in Menger outfall (circle) and Cibolo Creek confluence sites (triangles). The mean ± 1 standard error ASV richness, Pielou’s evenness, and Shannon diversity (B) across stream biofilms amended with nutrient treatments. Capital letters denote site differences between Menger and Cibolo Creek. The number of replicates varied for nutrient amendments due to subsampling 16S data. Cibolo Creek confluence control had a N = 5, nitrogen N = 4, N + P and P had N = 3, whereas Menger control had N = 3, nitrogen and P had N = 4, and N + P had N = 2.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Mean relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla or class for dominant Proteobacteria, within NDS discs in two stream reaches impacted by wastewater effluent in the Cibolo Creek Watershed in Boerne, TX, USA. Bars represent mean ± 1 standard error for each nutrient agar treatment within each site with Bacteroidota in (A), Alphaproteobacteria in (B), and Chloroflexi in (C). Gray bars denote Menger outfall site and white bars denote the Cibolo Creek confluence site. Lower-case letters denote pairwise statistical differences for a nutrient by site interaction term. Replicates varied for nutrient amendments due to subsampling 16S data. Cibolo Creek confluence control had a N = 5, nitrogen N = 4, N + P and P had N = 3, whereas Menger control had N = 3, nitrogen and P had N = 4, and N + P had N = 2.
Fig 4
Fig 4
The mean relative abundance of all sequences assigned to the Flavobacterium genus in nutrient amendments across sites. Dark gray represents mean abundance in the Menger outfall, and white represents mean abundance in the Cibolo confluence. Bars represent mean ± 1 standard error. Replicates varied for nutrient amendments due to subsampling 16S data. Cibolo Creek confluence control had a N = 5, nitrogen N = 4, N + P and P had N = 3, whereas Menger control had N = 3, nitrogen and P had N = 4, and N + P had N = 2.

Similar articles

References

    1. Strokal M, Bai Z, Franssen W, Hofstra N, Koelmans AA, Ludwig F, Ma L, van Puijenbroek P, Spanier JE, Vermeulen LC, van Vliet MTH, van Wijnen J, Kroeze C. 2021. Urbanization: an increasing source of multiple pollutants to rivers in the 21st century. npj Urban Sustain 1:24. doi:10.1038/s42949-021-00026-w - DOI
    1. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Taylor SL. 2004. The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environ Manage 34:112–124. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0221-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carey RO, Migliaccio KW. 2009. Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. Environ Manage 44:205–217. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9309-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamdhani H, Eppehimer DE, Bogan MT. 2020. Release of treated effluent into streams: a global review of ecological impacts with a consideration of its potential use for environmental flows. Freshw Biol 65:1657–1670. doi:10.1111/fwb.13519 - DOI
    1. Lewis GP, Mitchell JD, Andersen CB, Haney DC, Liao M-K, Sargent KA. 2007. Urban influences on stream chemistry and biology in the big brushy creek watershed, South Carolina. Water Air Soil Pollut 182:303–323. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9340-1 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources