Receptors and Host Factors for Enterovirus Infection: Implications for Cancer Therapy
- PMID: 39335111
- PMCID: PMC11430599
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183139
Receptors and Host Factors for Enterovirus Infection: Implications for Cancer Therapy
Abstract
Enteroviruses, with their diverse clinical manifestations ranging from mild or asymptomatic infections to severe diseases such as poliomyelitis and viral myocarditis, present a public health threat. However, they can also be used as oncolytic agents. This review shows the intricate relationship between enteroviruses and host cell factors. Enteroviruses utilize specific receptors and coreceptors for cell entry that are critical for infection and subsequent viral replication. These receptors, many of which are glycoproteins, facilitate virus binding, capsid destabilization, and internalization into cells, and their expression defines virus tropism towards various types of cells. Since enteroviruses can exploit different receptors, they have high oncolytic potential for personalized cancer therapy, as exemplified by the antitumor activity of certain enterovirus strains including the bioselected non-pathogenic Echovirus type 7/Rigvir, approved for melanoma treatment. Dissecting the roles of individual receptors in the entry of enteroviruses can provide valuable insights into their potential in cancer therapy. This review discusses the application of gene-targeting techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 technology to investigate the impact of the loss of a particular receptor on the attachment of the virus and its subsequent internalization. It also summarizes the data on their expression in various types of cancer. By understanding how enteroviruses interact with specific cellular receptors, researchers can develop more effective regimens of treatment, offering hope for more targeted and efficient therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9 technology; coxsackievirus; echovirus; enterovirus; oncolytic virus; viral receptors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Return of the Neurotropic Enteroviruses: Co-Opting Cellular Pathways for Infection.Viruses. 2021 Jan 22;13(2):166. doi: 10.3390/v13020166. Viruses. 2021. PMID: 33499355 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Therapeutic Use of Native and Recombinant Enteroviruses.Viruses. 2016 Feb 23;8(3):57. doi: 10.3390/v8030057. Viruses. 2016. PMID: 26907330 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antiviral Peptides Targeting the Helicase Activity of Enterovirus Nonstructural Protein 2C.J Virol. 2021 May 24;95(12):e02324-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02324-20. Print 2021 May 24. J Virol. 2021. PMID: 33789997 Free PMC article.
-
Potent oncolytic activity of human enteroviruses against human prostate cancer.Prostate. 2008 May 1;68(6):577-87. doi: 10.1002/pros.20741. Prostate. 2008. PMID: 18288643
-
Polyamine Depletion Abrogates Enterovirus Cellular Attachment.J Virol. 2019 Sep 30;93(20):e01054-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01054-19. Print 2019 Oct 15. J Virol. 2019. PMID: 31341056 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources