Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 27;11(9):869.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090869.

Research on Dual-Phase Composite Forming Process and Platform Construction of Radial Gradient Long Bone Scaffold

Affiliations

Research on Dual-Phase Composite Forming Process and Platform Construction of Radial Gradient Long Bone Scaffold

Haiguang Zhang et al. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

The structure and composition of natural bone show gradient changes. Most bone scaffolds prepared by bone tissue engineering with single materials and structures present difficulties in meeting the needs of bone defect repair. Based on the structure and composition of natural long bones, this study proposed a new bone scaffold preparation technology, the dual-phase composite forming process. Based on the composite use of multiple biomaterials, a bionic natural long bone structure bone scaffold model with bone scaffold pore structure gradient and material concentration gradient changes along the radial direction was designed. Different from the traditional method of using multiple nozzles to achieve material concentration gradient in the scaffold, the dual-phase composite forming process in this study achieved continuous 3D printing preparation of bone scaffolds with gradual material concentration gradient by controlling the speed of extruding materials from two feed barrels into a closed mixing chamber with one nozzle. Through morphological characterization and mechanical property analysis, the results showed that BS-G (radial gradient long bone scaffolds prepared by the dual-phase composite forming process) had obvious pore structure gradient changes and material concentration gradient changes, while BS-T (radial gradient long bone scaffolds prepared by printing three concentrations of material in separate regions) had a discontinuous gradient with obvious boundaries between the parts. The compressive strength of BS-G was 1.00 ± 0.19 MPa, which was higher than the compressive strength of BS-T, and the compressive strength of BS-G also met the needs of bone defect repair. The results of in vitro cell culture tests showed that BS-G had no cytotoxicity. In a Sprague-Dawley rat experimental model, blood tests and key organ sections showed no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group. The prepared BS-G was verified to have good biocompatibility and lays a foundation for the subsequent study of the bone repair effect of radial gradient long bone scaffolds in large animals.

Keywords: bone scaffold; continuous printing; radial gradient tapering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radial gradient long bone scaffold structure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of radial gradient long bone scaffold composition gradient.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structure diagram of the test platform for radial gradient long bone scaffold.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sectional view of closed mixing chamber.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic print paths for odd and even layers: (a) odd layer; (b) even layer.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Radial gradient long bone scaffold formation: (a) preparation process of radial gradient long bone scaffold BS-G; (bf) physical images of physical images of the scaffold.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Viscosity as a function of shear rate at 25 °C.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The XRD patterns of Gel, SA, nHA, and BS-G.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Macroscopic and microscopic morphology of radial gradient long bone scaffold.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Compressive stress–strain curve.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Proliferation test results of scaffolds in each group: (a) HUVEC proliferation test results; (b) BMSC proliferation test results.
Figure 12
Figure 12
HUVEC adhesion test results (scale bar is 500 μm).
Figure 13
Figure 13
BMSC adhesion test results (scale bar is 500 μm).
Figure 14
Figure 14
Blood routine test results.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Results of liver and kidney function biochemical tests.
Figure 16
Figure 16
H&E staining results (scale bar is 200 μm).

Similar articles

References

    1. Fu Q., Saiz E., Rahaman M.N., Tomsia A.P. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2011;31:1245–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roddy E., DeBaun M.R., Daoud-Gray A., Yang Y.P., Gardner M.J. Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: Clinical and tissue engineering perspectives. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2018;28:351–362. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W., Nichols L., Brinkley F., Bohna K., Tian W., Priddy M.W., Priddy L.B. Alkali treatment facilitates functional nano-hydroxyapatite coating of 3D printed polylactic acid scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2021;120:111686. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111686. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song Y., Hu Q., Liu Q., Liu S., Wang Y., Zhang H. Design and fabrication of drug-loaded alginate/hydroxyapatite/collagen composite scaffolds for repairing infected bone defects. J. Mater. Sci. 2023;58:911–926. doi: 10.1007/s10853-022-08053-3. - DOI
    1. Zhang Y., Liu X., Zeng L., Zhang J., Zuo J., Zou J., Ding J., Chen X. Polymer Fiber Scaffolds for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29:1903279. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201903279. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources