Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 11;22(1):202.
doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02005-w.

Preventing illegal seafood trade using machine-learning assisted microbiome analysis

Affiliations

Preventing illegal seafood trade using machine-learning assisted microbiome analysis

Luca Peruzza et al. BMC Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Seafood is increasingly traded worldwide, but its supply chain is particularly prone to frauds. To increase consumer confidence, prevent illegal trade, and provide independent validation for eco-labelling, accurate tools for seafood traceability are needed. Here we show that the use of microbiome profiling (MP) coupled with machine learning (ML) allows precise tracing the origin of Manila clams harvested in areas separated by small geographic distances. The study was designed to represent a real-world scenario. Clams were collected in different seasons across the most important production area in Europe (lagoons along the northern Adriatic coast) to cover the known seasonal variation in microbiome composition for the species. DNA extracted from samples underwent the same depuration process as commercial products (i.e. at least 12 h in open flow systems).

Results: Machine learning-based analysis of microbiome profiles was carried out using two completely independent sets of data (collected at the same locations but in different years), one for training the algorithm, and the other for testing its accuracy and assessing the temporal stability signal. Briefly, gills (GI) and digestive gland (DG) of clams were collected in summer and winter over two different years (i.e. from 2018 to 2020) in one banned area and four farming sites. 16S DNA metabarcoding was performed on clam tissues and the obtained amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) table was used as input for ML MP. The best-predicting performances were obtained using the combined information of GI and DG (consensus analysis), showing a Cohen K-score > 0.95 when the target was the classification of samples collected from the banned area and those harvested at farming sites. Classification of the four different farming areas showed slightly lower accuracy with a 0.76 score.

Conclusions: We show here that MP coupled with ML is an effective tool to trace the origin of shellfish products. The tool is extremely robust against seasonal and inter-annual variability, as well as product depuration, and is ready for implementation in routine assessment to prevent the trade of illegally harvested or mislabeled shellfish.

Keywords: Food traceability; Illegal unreported unregulated (IUU) fishing; Machine learning; Manila clam; Microbiota 16S; North Adriatic sea.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Confusion matrices showing the results of the ML predicted provenance (“Predicted label”) versus the real provenance (“True label”) for each of the tested samples by using gills (GI) only (left column), digestive gland (DG) only (middle column) or by combining GI and DG into a consensus prediction (right column). A, B Classification discriminating between the polluted site PM and the clean farming sites of CL (A) and SC (B). C Classification assessing the origin of samples among the four farming areas considered in the study. Colour scale is proportional to the number of samples that are assigned to a specific location. MA, Marano; PM, Porto Marghera; CL, Chioggia; SC, Scardovari; GO, Goro
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map showing the sampling areas: two from the Venice lagoon, two from the Po river delta and one from the Marano and Grado lagoon. MA, Marano; PM, Porto Marghera; CL, Chioggia; SC, Scardovari; GO, Goro

Similar articles

References

    1. Thomsen ST, Assunção R, Afonso C, Boué G, Cardoso C, Cubadda F, et al. Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62:7479–502. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1915240 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mamede R, Ricardo F, Santos A, Díaz S, Santos SAO, Bispo R, et al. Revealing the illegal harvesting of Manila clams (Ruditapes philippinarum) using fatty acid profiles of the adductor muscle. Food Control. 2020;118:107368.10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107368 - DOI
    1. Martini A, Aguiari L, Capoccioni F, Martinoli M, Napolitano R, Pirlo G, et al. Is Manila clam farming environmentally sustainable? A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach applied to an Italian Ruditapes philippinarum hatchery. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3237.10.3390/su15043237 - DOI
    1. Humphreys J, Harris MRC, Herbert RJH, Farrell P, Jensen A, Cragg SM. Introduction, dispersal and naturalization of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum in British estuaries, 1980–2010. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2015;95:1163–72.10.1017/S0025315415000132 - DOI
    1. Turolla E, Castaldelli G, Fano EA, Tamburini E. Life cycle assessment (LCA) proves that Manila clam farming (Ruditapes philippinarum) is a fully sustainable aquaculture practice and a carbon sink. Sustainability. 2020;12(13):5252.10.3390/su12135252 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources