Glyphosate, an herbicide largely used in various contexts, can have adverse effects on human health. Although it is currently the most applied pesticide worldwide, few studies evaluated the extent of human exposure via biomonitoring. To expand such information, biological monitoring of exposure to glyphosate was conducted. The study has a before-and-after design to demonstrate the immediate impact of short-term interventions. Accordingly, the urine concentrations of glyphosate and its main biodegradation product (amino-methylphosphonic acid- AMPA) were measured before and the day after the single herbicide application in 17 male winegrowers. Urine samples were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source. Glyphosate and AMPA were not detectable in pre-application urine samples (limit of quantification for glyphosate (LOQ_G) was 0.1 μg/L; limit of quantification for AMPA (LOQ_AMPA) was 0.5 μg/L). After application, glyphosate urinary levels were above LOQ_G in all workers. The median, min, and max values were 2.30, 0.51, and 47.2 μg/L, respectively. The same values were found for 50 %, 5 % and 95 % percentiles. After assigning numerical values, such as one half the LOQ, to each of the non-detects, the "z" of Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was -3.62 (p = 0.0003), suggesting the pre-application values being significantly lower than the post-application urinary glyphosate concentration. A similar analysis was not feasible with AMPA urinary levels, which were detectable only in 3 workers, after application. 12 (71 %) workers were significantly exposed to glyphosate, but adherence to the adoption of personal protective equipment was good: 14 (82 %) workers used gloves, 13 (76 %) used overalls and 13 (76 %) facial masks. Our data show that glyphosate can be absorbed by the workers after a single application and confirms the usefulness of biomonitoring in exposed workers. Further studies are needed in larger working populations and with multiple glyphosate applications, as well as to evaluate the correlations of glyphosate urine levels with exposure questionnaire data, in order to assess the actual relevance of risk and protection factors.